首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission
【24h】

Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission

机译:自体干细胞移植与寄生术中急性髓性白血病患者的自体干细胞移植与寄生术中急性骨髓性白血病患者的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an attractive postremission treatment option for patients with intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for some favorable-risk AML patients with additional nongenetic risk factors. Autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and haploidentical donor SCT (haplo-SCT) are the widely used alternatives in cases of a lack of a HLA-matched donor. However, limited data have been published on the direct comparison between these 2 transplant types. Based on the transplant database in our center, we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Patients with extramedullary disease or those achieving CR by more than 2 cycles were excluded. In total, 195 patients were included in the study, 88 of whom underwent auto-SCT and 107 haplo-SCT. In the entire cohort analyses the impact of high relapse incidence in the auto-SCT group was compensated by low nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which resulted in a comparable overall survival (OS) (79.0%+/- 4.6% versus 80.1%+/- 5.0%, P=.769) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (66.1%+/- 5.2% versus 77.4%+/- 4.8%, P=.079) compared with those observed in the haplo-SCT group. However, for patients with intermediate-risk AML NRM was similar between the groups, and haplo-SCT exhibited superior survival. In case of post-SCT relapse, patients with intermediate-risk AML showed markedly inferior 3-year OS compared with that shown by patients with favorable-risk AML (23.3%+/- 9.8% versus 60.8%+/- 14.3%, P=.011). In the multivariate analyses, minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by flow cytometry and gene mutation status before transplantation were independent predictors for both OS and RFS. We concluded that both auto-SCT and haplo-SCT were acceptable options for postremission treatment of patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML. Haplo-SCT yielded a better outcome in patients with intermediate risk AML, but the relapse after SCT still led to a poor outcome. Clearance of MRD before SOT could improve the prognosis after transplantation. (C) 2017 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
机译:干细胞移植(SCT)是患有急性骨髓白血病(AML)的患者的有吸引力的POStremission治疗选择,以及一些有利风险的AML患者患有额外的环境危险因素。自体SCT(自动SCT)和Haploidentical供体SCT(HAPLO-SCT)是缺乏HLA匹配的供体的案例中广泛使用的替代品。但是,已在这2种移植类型之间的直接比较上公布了有限的数据。根据我们中心的移植数据库,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,涉及第一次完全缓解(CR1)的患者,根据国家综合癌症网络指南,涉及有利和中间风险AML的患者。患有尿布疾病的患者或达到2个以上循环的患者被排除在外。总共包括195名患者,其中88名接受了自动SCT和107个HAPLO-SCT。在整个队列中,分析通过低非卷重病度(NRM)来补偿自动-SCT组高复发入射率的影响,这导致了总体存活(OS)相当(OS)(79.0%+ / - 4.6%,而不是80.1%+ /与HAPLO-SCT组中观察到的人相比,5.0%,P = .769)和无复发存活(RFS)(66.1%+ / - 5.2%,P = .079)。然而,对于中间风险AML NRM的患者在组之间具有相似的患者,并且HAPLO-SCT表现出优异的存活率。在SCT后复发后,中间风险AML的患者显示出明显较低的3年OS,与患有有利风险AML的患者(23.3%+ / - 9.8%与60.8%+ / - 14.3%,P = .011)。在多变量分析中,在移植前通过流式细胞术和基因突变状态测量的最小残余疾病(MRD)是OS和RFS的独立预测因子。我们得出结论,Auto-SCT和HAPLO-SCT都是有利和中间风险AML患者的开放治疗的可接受选择。 HAPLO-SCT在中间风险AML的患者中产生了更好的结果,但SCT后复发仍然导致了较差的结果。在SOT之前MRD的清除可以改善移植后的预后。 (c)2017年美国血液和骨髓移植协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号