首页> 外文期刊>Applied optics >Review and accuracy comparison of various permittivity-averaging schemes for material discontinuities in the two-dimensional FDFD method: implementation using efficient computer graphics techniques
【24h】

Review and accuracy comparison of various permittivity-averaging schemes for material discontinuities in the two-dimensional FDFD method: implementation using efficient computer graphics techniques

机译:二维FDFD方法中材料不连续等各种介电常数平均方案的审查和准确性比较:使用有效的计算机图形技术实现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several known and widely used averaging techniques aiming to improve the accuracy of the two-dimensional finite-difference frequency-domain (FDFD) method, in the presence of material discontinuities, are reviewed, numerically tested, and compared with respect to their accuracies. Furthermore, all averaging techniques are rigorously and efficiently implemented using the Supercover Digital Differential Analyzer algorithm and a modified Liang-Barsky algorithm suitably adapted from computer graphics applications. The FDFD with Gaussian blurring; the FDFD with volume-polarized effective permittivity; the FDFD with volume-polarized effective permittivity on shifted cells; and the FDFD with anisotropic smoothing [FDFD (AS)] are compared with respect to their accuracies (for both TE and TM polarization), in the case of scattering by an infinite homogeneous cylinder (for which analytical solution exists) comprising a lossless dielectric, a high-index, low-loss dielectric, or a metal. Sample plots of the relative errors are presented for various field components. Absolute error norms (L-2 and L-infinity) are also presented for both polarizations and for two grid-cell sizes for quantitative comparisons. The results show that the FDFD (AS) prevails in accuracy mainly because it satisfies the boundary conditions at the cylinder's boundary the best. However, for the high-index dielectrics and metals, even the FDFD without any averaging gives very good results for the field components parallel to the uniformity direction. However, the FDFD (AS) is always more accurate when the in-plane field components are sought. (c) 2018 Optical Society of America.
机译:若干已知的和广泛使用的平均技术旨在提高二维有限差分频率域(FDFD)方法的准确性,在存在物质不连续性的情况下,进行了数值测试,并与其准确性相比。此外,使用Supercover数字差分分析仪算法和适用于计算机图形应用的改进的梁Barsky算法严格和有效地实现所有平均技术。具有高斯模糊的FDFD;具有体积极化有效介电常数的FDFD;具有体积极化有效介电常数的FDFD在移位细胞上;与具有各向异性平滑的FDFD相对于它们的精度(对于TE和TM偏振)进行比较,在散射无限均匀的圆柱(存在的分析解决方案)的情况下,包括无损电介质的情况下,高折射率,低损耗电介质或金属。针对各种场部件提出了相对误差的样本图。对于两种极化,也呈现绝对误差规范(L-2和L-Infinity),以及用于定量比较的两个网格单元尺寸。结果表明,FDFD(AS)的准确性主要是因为它满足了最佳的边界处的边界条件。然而,对于高索引电介质和金属,即使没有任何平均的FDFD也为平行于均匀性方向的场部件提供了非常好的结果。但是,当寻求面内现场分量时,FDFD(AS)总是更准确的。 (c)2018年光学学会。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号