首页> 外文期刊>Applied optics >Intercomparison of airborne multi-angle polarimeter observations from the Polarimeter Definition Experiment
【24h】

Intercomparison of airborne multi-angle polarimeter observations from the Polarimeter Definition Experiment

机译:从偏振仪定义实验中的空气传播多角度偏振仪观测的相互熟练

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In early 2013, three airborne polarimeters were flown on the high altitude NASA ER-2 aircraft in California for the Polarimeter Definition Experiment (PODEX). PODEX supported the pre-formulation NASA Aerosol- Cloud-Ecosystem (ACE) mission, which calls for an imaging polarimeter in polar orbit (among other instruments) for the remote sensing of aerosols, oceans, and clouds. Several polarimeter concepts exist as airborne prototypes, some of which were deployed during PODEX as a capabilities test. Two of those instruments to date have successfully produced Level 1 (georegistered, calibrated radiance and polarization) data from that campaign: the Airborne Multiangle Spectropolarimetric Imager (AirMSPI) and the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). We compared georegistered observations of a variety of scene types by these instruments to test whether Level 1 products agreed within stated uncertainties. Initial comparisons found radiometric agreement, but polarimetric biases beyond measurement uncertainties. After subsequent updates to calibration, georegistration, and the measurement uncertainty models, observations from the instruments now largely agree within stated uncertainties. However, the 470 nm reflectance channels have a roughly +6% bias of AirMSPI relative to RSP, beyond expected measurement uncertainties. We also find that observations of dark (ocean) scenes, where polarimetric uncertainty is expected to be largest, do not agree within stated polarimetric uncertainties. Otherwise, AirMSPI and RSP observations are consistent within measurement uncertainty expectations, providing credibility for the subsequent creation of Level 2 (geophysical product) data from these instruments, and comparison thereof. The techniques used in this work can also form a methodological basis for other intercomparisons, for example, of the data gathered during the recent Aerosol Characterization from Polarimeter and Lidar (ACEPOL) field campaign, carried out in October and November of 2017 with four polarimeters (including AirMSPI and RSP). (C) 2019 Optical Society of America
机译:2013年初,在加利福尼亚州的高空NASE ER-2飞机上飞行了三个空气传播的直线,用于偏振仪定义实验(PODEX)。 PODEX支持预先配制NASA Aerosol-Cloud-Ecosystem(ACE)任务,该使命要求在极性轨道(其他仪器中)进行成像偏振仪,用于遥感气溶胶,海洋和云。几个偏振仪概念存在作为机载原型,其中一些在PODEX期间部署为能力测试。这些迄今为止的两个工具已经成功地从该活动中成功地产生了1级(地理位置,校准的光线和极化)数据:空中多聚分光基化成像器(Airmspi)和研究扫描偏振仪(RSP)。我们通过这些仪器比较了各种场景类型的地理位置观测,以测试1级产品是否在规定的不确定性内商定。初始比较发现辐射算法协议,但是超出了超出测量不确定性的偏振。在随后更新校准,地理标记和测量不确定性模型之后,仪器的观测现在在很大程度上同意在规定的不确定性内。然而,470nm反射通道相对于RSP具有大约+ 6%的AirMSPI偏差,超出预期的测量不确定性。我们还发现,预期极化不确定性最大的暗(海洋)场景的观察,不同意在规定的偏振不确定性内。否则,AirMSPI和RSP观察在测量不确定性期望中是一致的,为来自这些仪器的后续2级(地球物理产品)数据提供可信度,以及其比较。本作工作中使用的技术还可以为其他离法组成一种方法基础,例如,在偏振仪和LIDAR(Acepol)现场运动期间收集的数据,2017年10月和11月在2017年10月和11月(包括Airmspi和RSP)。 (c)2019年光学学会

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号