...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Methods of estimating or accounting for neighborhood associations with health using complex survey data
【24h】

Methods of estimating or accounting for neighborhood associations with health using complex survey data

机译:使用复杂的调查数据估算或说明与健康相关的邻里关系的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reasons for health disparities may include neighborhood-level factors, such as availability of health services, social norms, and environmental determinants, as well as individual-level factors. Investigating health inequalities using nationally or locally representative data often requires an approach that can accommodate a complex sampling design, in which individuals have unequal probabilities of selection into the study. The goal of the present article is to review and compare methods of estimating or accounting for neighborhood influences with complex survey data. We considered 3 types of methods, each generalized for use with complex survey data: ordinary regression, conditional likelihood regression, and generalized linear mixed-model regression. The relative strengths and weaknesses of each method differ from one study to another; we provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each method theoretically, in terms of the nature of the estimable associations and the plausibility of the assumptions required for validity, and also practically, via a simulation study and 2 epidemiologic data analyses. The first analysis addresses determinants of repeat mammography screening use using data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. The second analysis addresses disparities in preventive oral health care using data from the 2008 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.
机译:健康差异的原因可能包括社区层面的因素,例如卫生服务的可获得性,社会规范和环境决定因素,以及个人层面的因素。使用国家或地方代表性数据调查健康不平等现象,通常需要采用一种能够适应复杂抽样设计的方法,其中个体具有不平等的入选研究可能性。本文的目的是回顾和比较使用复杂的调查数据估算或解释邻里影响的方法。我们考虑了三种类型的方法,每种方法都可用于复杂的调查数据:普通回归,条件似然回归和广义线性混合模型回归。每种方法的相对优缺点因一项研究而异。我们从可估计的关联的性质和有效性所需假设的合理性的角度,从理论上概述了每种方法的优缺点,并且实际上还通过模拟研究和2种流行病学数据分析,对每种方法的优缺点进行了概述。第一项分析使用2005年国家健康访问调查中的数据,对重复进行X线摄影检查的决定因素进行了分析。第二项分析使用了2008年佛罗里达州行为风险因素监视系统调查中的数据解决了口腔预防保健方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号