...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation >Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors

机译:术后杯霉菌活检效果,安全性和成本效果的比较与喉咽肿瘤的手术室活组织检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the diagnostic yield, safety, and cost of biopsies of laryngopharyngeal tumor performed in an office setting with those performed in the operating room (OR) under general anesthesia. Study Design: This was a retrospective review of patients' records at Boston Medical Center from 2006 to 2008. Methods: In-office biopsies were performed using flexible digital videolaryngoscopy with cup forcep biopsies taken via the working channel in patients in whom cancer was strongly suspected. Patients whose in-office biopsies were nondiagnostic or suspected to be falsely negative were taken to the OR for biopsy under general anesthesia and served as the control group. Results: Twelve patients fit the selection criteria and had in-office biopsies attempted. One patient could not tolerate the in-office biopsy. Seven of the 11 in-office biopsies performed were diagnostic for squamous cell carcinoma. The average cost (facility and professional otolaryngology charges) for an in-office biopsy was $2053.91. Five of these patients required further biopsy in the OR at an average cost (charges for surgeon, OR, anesthesia, and recovery room) of $9024.47. There were no significant complications reported for any of the procedures. Conclusions: In patients with strongly suspected laryngopharyngeal cancer, in-office cup forcep biopsies were 64% diagnostic. When compared with the OR, in-office cup biopsies of laryngopharyngeal tumor are safe and considerably more cost-effective. Although 36% of patients required operative biopsies, the cost would have been considerably higher in this cohort if all patients had gone to the OR for biopsies.
机译:目的:比较在办公室环境中进行的喉咽肿瘤活检,安全性和成本与在一般麻醉下的手术室(或)中进行的那些。研究设计:这是从2006年到2008年开始对波士顿医疗中心患者记录的回顾性审查。方法:使用柔性数字录像诊断镜,通过通过癌症的患者的工作通道进行柔性数字录像镜检查杯霉菌活组织检查。 。患者在办公室活组织检查被非诊断或怀疑被怀旧的阴性被用于全身麻醉下的活组织检查,并用作对照组。结果:12名患者适合选择标准,并试图办公室活检。一名患者不能容忍办公室的活检。进行的11位办公活检中的七种是对鳞状细胞癌进行诊断。办公室活检的平均成本(设施和专业耳鼻喉科)是2053.91美元。这些患者中的五种患者需要进一步的活组织检查或平均成本(外科医生的费用,或麻醉和恢复室)$ 9024.47。任何程序都没有报告有重大的并发症。结论:在患有强烈怀疑喉咽癌的患者中,办公杯霉菌活检诊断为64%。与喉咽肿瘤的办公室杯子活组织检查相比,喉咽肿瘤的相比是安全的,更具成本效益。虽然36%的患者需要手术活组织检查,但如果所有患者都达到了活组织检查,这队列的成本在这队列中会有相当高的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号