首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Medical Library Association : >Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials
【24h】

Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials

机译:计算机化与手工评分的健康识字工具:在印刷患者教育材料中的GobbleyGook(Smog)和Flesch-Kincaid的简单措施的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: The research compared and contrasted hand-scoring and computerized methods of evaluating the grade level of patient education materials that are distributed at an academic medical center in east Tennessee and sought to determine if these materials adhered to the American Medical Association's (AMA's) recommended reading level of sixth grade.
机译:目的:评估在东田纳西州的学术医疗中心分发的患者教育材料等级水平的比较和对比的手工评分和计算机化方法,并试图确定这些材料是否遵守美国医学协会(AMA)推荐的 阅读水平的六年级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号