首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >Does neuropsychological test performance predict outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome and what is the role of underperformance?
【24h】

Does neuropsychological test performance predict outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome and what is the role of underperformance?

机译:神经心理学测试性能是否预测了慢性疲劳综合征的认知行为治疗的结果,表现不佳的作用是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: A subgroup of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) has cognitive impairments, reflected by deviant neuropsychological test performance. However, abnormal test scores can also be caused by suboptimal effort. We hypothesized that worse neuropsychological test performance and underperformance were related to each other and to a smaller reduction in fatigue, functional impairments, physical limitations and higher dropout rates following cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for CFS. Methods: Data were drawn from a previous trial, in which CFS patients were randomized to two conditions; 1) guided self-instruction and additional CBT (n = 84) or 2) waiting period followed by regular CBT for CFS (n = 85). Underperformance was assessed using the Amsterdam Short Term Memory Test (< 84). To test neuropsychological test performance, the Symbol Digit Modalities Task, a simple reaction time task and a choice reaction time task were used. Interaction effects were determined between underperformance and neuropsychological test performance on therapy outcomes. Results: Underperformance was associated to worse neuropsychological test performance, but there were no significant interaction effects of these two factors by therapy on fatigue severity, functional impairments and physical limitations, but there was a significant main effect of underperformance on functional impairments, physical limitations and dropout rates. Conclusion: Underperformance or neuropsychological test performance was not related to the change in fatigue, functional impairments, and physical limitations following CBT for CFS. However, underperforming patients did drop out more often. Therapists should pay attention to beliefs and behavioral or environmental factors that might maintain underperformance and increase the risk of dropout.
机译:目的:慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者的亚组具有认知障碍,反映了偏差神经心理学测试性能。然而,异常的测试分数也可能是由次优努力引起的。我们假设最严重的神经心理学测试性能和表现不佳,彼此相关,并且在CFS的认知行为治疗(CBT)后疲劳,功能损伤,身体限制和更高的辍学率较小。方法:从先前的试验中提取数据,其中CFS患者随机分为两个条件; 1)引导自指导和附加的CBT(n = 84)或2)等待期,然后是CFS的常规CBT(n = 85)。使用Amsterdam短期记忆测试(<84)评估表现不佳。为了测试神经心理学测试性能,使用符号数字模式任务,简单的反应时间任务和选择反应时间任务。在治疗结果的表现不佳和神经心理学测试性能之间确定相互作用效应。结果:表现不佳与较差的神经心理学测试性能有关,但通过治疗疲劳严重程度,功能障碍和身体限制,这两个因素没有显着的相互作用影响,但在功能性障碍,身体限制和身体限制和身体局限性表现不佳的主要影响辍学率。结论:表现不佳或神经心理学检测性能与CBT后疲劳,功能损伤和物理限制的变化无关。然而,表现表现患者更频繁地脱落。治疗师应注意可能保持表现不佳并增加辍学风险的信仰和行为或环境因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号