...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Mindray 3-directional NMT Module (a new generation 'Tri-axial' neuromuscular monitor) versus the Relaxometer mechanomyograph and versus the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph
【24h】

Mindray 3-directional NMT Module (a new generation 'Tri-axial' neuromuscular monitor) versus the Relaxometer mechanomyograph and versus the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph

机译:Mindray 3方向NMT模块(新一代“三轴”神经肌肉监测器)与松弛计力学素和TOF手表SX加速度表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently introduced Mindray "3-directional" neuromuscular transmission transducer (NMT, Shenzhen, China) acceleromyograph) claim to monitor thumb movement in 3 different directions. We compared NMT with the gold standard Relaxometer (R) mechanomyograph (MMG, Groningen University, Netherlands) in Study-1 and with TOF-Watch SX (TM) (WTCH) acceleromyograph from which it was developed in Study-2. We used first twitch (T-1%) and train-of-four (TOF) ratio rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-1) neuromuscular block to evaluate NMT diagnostic accuracy in indicating 3 clinically relevant time points namely; MMG T-1 5% (95% twitch depression) for tracheal intubation, MMG T-1 25% for repeat neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) administration, and MMG 0.9 TOF ratio full neuromuscular block recovery. We compared onset time (time from beginning of rocuronium administration until maximal depression), Dur(25) (time until T-1 25% recovery) and Dur(0.9) (time until 0.9 TOF ratio recovery). In Study-1, NMT showed low sensitivity in indicating MMG time for tracheal intubation, repeat NMBAs administration and full neuromuscular block recovery (6.25%, 38.9% and 38.9% respectively). NMT onset time, Dur(25) and Dur(0.9) (2:51 +/- 00:57, 36:50 +/- 24:25, 70:08 +/- 25:27 min:s) were significantly longer than MMG (1:56 +/- 00:46, 30:26 +/- 20:24, 62:03 +/- 20:01). In Study-2, NMT onset time, Dur(25) and Dur(0.9) (02:37 +/- 00:53, 35:38 +/- 11:54, 53:40 +/- 13:49) were not significantly different than WTCH (02:23 +/- 00:45, 33:27 +/- 12:51, 53:57 +/- 12:47). NMT could not efficaciously detect MMG time for tracheal intubation; NMBAs repeat dose administration or full neuromuscular block recovery. Data from NMT cannot be used interchangeably with MMG. Our study revealed that NMT Tri-axial acceleromyography seems to offer no advantage over the MMG gold standard or the classic Mono-axial TOF-Watch SX monitor.
机译:最近推出的MindRay“三维”神经肌肉传输传感器(NMT,深圳,中国)加速度焦虑)声称在3个不同方向上监测拇指运动。我们将NMT与Gold Standard Soulleter(R)力学素(MMG,Groningen University,荷兰)进行了比较-1和Tof-Watch Sx(TM)(WTCH)加速度乐谱系,它在研究-2中开发。我们使用了第一个抽搐(T-1%)和训练 - 四(TOF)比率罗孔0.6mg kg(-1)神经肌肉块,以评估NMT诊断准确性,表明3个临床相关的时间点。 MMG T-1 5%(95%抽头凹陷)用于气管插管,MMG T-1 25%用于重复神经肌肉阻断剂(NMBA)给药,MMG 0.9 TOF比全神经肌肉嵌段恢复。我们比较起发时间(从罗酮酮酮施用到最大抑制的时间),Dur(25)(Time直到T-1 25%回收)和Dur(0.9)(时间直到0.9 TOF比率恢复)。在研究-1中,NMT在表明用于气管插管的MMG时间,重复NMBAS施用和全神经肌块恢复(分别为6.25%,38.9%和38.9%)。 NMT发作时间,DUR(25)和DUR(0.9)(2:51 +/- 00:57,36:50 +/- 24:25,70:08 +/- 25:27 min:s)显着更长比mmg(1:56 +/- 00:46,30:26 +/- 20:24,62:03 + - 20:01)。在研究-2,NMT发作时间,Dur(25)和Dur(0.9)(02:37 +/- 00:53,35:38 +/- 11:54,53:40 +/- 13:49没有明显不同于wtch(02:23 +/- 00:45,33:27 +/- 12:51,53:57 +/- 12:47)。 NMT无法效力地检测气管插管的MMG时间; NMBA重复剂量给药或全神经肌肉嵌段恢复。来自NMT的数据不能与MMG互换使用。我们的研究表明,NMT三轴加速度似乎没有通过MMG金标准或经典的单轴TOF手表SX监视器提供优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号