首页> 外文期刊>Journal of anxiety disorders >Reliability and validity of the dimensional features of generalized anxiety disorder
【24h】

Reliability and validity of the dimensional features of generalized anxiety disorder

机译:广义焦虑症尺寸特征的可靠性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The reliability and validity of the dimensional features of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were examined in a diverse sample of 508 outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders who underwent two independent administrations of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L; Di Nardo, Brown, & Barlow, 1994). Inter-rater reliability was higher in the full sample than in patients with current GAD. Additionally, the presence of a mood disorder weakened inter-rater reliability. We also explored the unique contribution of excessiveness and uncontrollability of worry to various clinical outcomes and found that excessiveness predicted anxiety, depression, and stress self-report measures, and uncontrollability predicted clinical severity and number of diagnoses. Findings are discussed with regard to their implications for the classification of GAD (e.g., utility of dimension-based assessment to improve the classification of psychological disorders). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在508名门诊患者的不同样品中检查了广义焦虑症(GAD)尺寸特征的可靠性和有效性,焦虑和情绪障碍患者接受了两个独立的焦虑障碍访谈时间表的DSM-IV:寿命版本(ADIS- IV-L; DI Nardo,Brown,&Barlow,1994)。完整样品中的帧间间可靠性高于当前GAD的患者。另外,情绪障碍的存在削弱了帧间间可靠性。我们还探讨了对各种临床结果的忧虑过度和无法控制的独特贡献,发现过度预测焦虑,抑郁和压力自我报告措施,以及无法控制的预测临床严重程度和诊断数量。关于它们对GAD分类的影响讨论了调查结果(例如,基于维度的评估的效用,以改善心理障碍分类)。 (c)2014年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号