【24h】

Image quality

机译:画面质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

WHILE the resolution graphs of each lens look very similar, there are a few models that really stand out. Most notable are the Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 and Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 50mm f/2. At 1 stop down from the minimum aperture, both these lenses perform exceptionally well, with the f/1.4 resolving the most detail of any lens in the test. While the Zeiss f/1.4 is extremely sharp at f/8 and f/11, it is, along with the Zeiss f/2 macro, the worst lens on test here when shooting with the aperture wide open at f/1.4. Similarly, the performance of the Pentax SMC DA* 55mm f/1.4 SDM isn't particularly great when wide open, with the corners and edges resolving almost the same amount of detail.
机译:虽然每个镜头的分辨率图看起来非常相似,但有些型号确实很出色。最著名的是Zeiss Planar T * 50mm f / 1.4和Zeiss Makro-Planar T * 50mm f / 2。在最小光圈下停止1个位置时,这两个镜头的表现都非常出色,f / 1.4可以解决测试中任何镜头的最细节问题。当蔡司f / 1.4在f / 8和f / 11时非常清晰时,它与蔡司f / 2宏一起在光圈为f / 1.4的情况下进行拍摄时,这是测试中最差的镜头。同样,Pentax SMC DA * 55mm f / 1.4 SDM在全开时的性能也不是特别出色,角落和边缘几乎可以分辨出相同数量的细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号