...
首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension research: Official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension >A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system-This article has been corrected since advance Online Publication, and an erratum is also printed in this issue
【24h】

A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system-This article has been corrected since advance Online Publication, and an erratum is also printed in this issue

机译:由GAON系统和血管血管系统获得的中央血压值之间的比较 - 本文已被纠正以来在线出版物,并在此问题中打印了错误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Central pulse pressure is correlated with carotid atherosclerosis and the incidence of cardiovascular events more significantly than brachial pulse pressure. Augmentation index (Aix) has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Pulse wave analysis using the Gaon system allows for the estimation of central blood pressure (CBP), corrected augmentation index (Aix@HR75), ejection duration (ED) and subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), and is widely used in clinical research in Korea. However, the accuracy of this system is controversial. From February 2008 to March 2011, 99 patients were recruited for this study. Measurements were taken both by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system on the same day for all study participants. The estimated values of CBP, Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR for the two systems were compared using paired Mests, simple correlation analyses and Bland-Altman plots. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) estimated by the two systems was significantly (P< 0.001) correlated; the coefficient was 0.982. The two s.d. of the difference in SBP between these systems was quite small-<7 mm Hg. Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR as estimated by the two systems were also significantly correlated, although they, especially SEVR, showed much weaker correlations than were observed in SBP: coefficients for Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR were 0.727, 0.648 and 0.230, respectively. We assessed the CBP of Korean patients estimated by the two systems and observed that the correlations of Aix, ED and SEVR were weaker than that of CBP. Such variations may be due to the difference in measuring methods between the devices. As even a slight change in pulse waveforms may result in a large difference in estimations, parameters, including Aix@HR75, ED and SEVR, should be carefully interpreted by experienced clinicians.
机译:中央脉冲压力与颈动脉粥样硬化和颈血管事件的发生率比肱脉冲压力更大。增强指数(AIX)已被证明是心血管发病率和死亡率的独立预测因子。使用Gaon系统的脉冲波分析允许估计中央血压(CBP),校正的增强指数(AIX @ HR75),喷射持续时间(ED)和潜在的活性比(SEVR),并且广泛用于韩国的临床研究中。但是,该系统的准确性是有争议的。从2008年2月到2011年3月,99名患者被招募了这项研究。通过Gaon系统和血压孔系统在所有研究参与者的同一天进行测量。使用配对的Mests,简单的相关分析和Bland-Altman图,比较了两种系统的CBP,AIX @ HR75,ED和SEVR的估计值。由两个系统估计的收缩压(SBP)显着(P <0.001)相关;系数为0.982。两个S.D.这些系统之间的SBP差异非常小 - <7mm Hg。 AIX @ HR75,SEVR的两个系统估计也显着相关,尽管它们,尤其是SEVR,表现出比在SBP中观察到的较弱的相关性:AIX @ HR75的系数,ED和SEVR为0.727,0.648和0.230,分别。我们评估了两种系统估计的韩国患者的CBP,并观察到AIX,ED和SEVR的相关性比CBP的相关性。这种变型可能是由于设备之间的测量方法的差异。由于脉搏波形的略微变化可能导致估计差异很大,因此经验丰富的临床医生应仔细解释包括AIX @ HR75,ED和SEVR的参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号