...
首页> 外文期刊>HEC forum: an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals’ ethical and legal issues >Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part I
【24h】

Making Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Without Proxies: Part I

机译:没有代理的无能为力的患者做出医疗决策:第一部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To date no one has identified or described the population of incapacitated patients being treated in an inpatient setting who lack proxy decision-makers. Nor, despite repeated calls for protocols to be developed for decision-making, has any institution reported on the utilization of such a protocol. In 2005, our urban tertiary care hospital instituted a protocol utilizing community members of the ethics committee to meet with the medical providers and engage in shared decision-making for patients without proxies (PWPs). We conducted a retrospective chart review and in this paper describe nearly 200 patients who were identified and treated according to the protocol over a 12 year period. After an aggressive search, family members were located for a surprising number of patients, leaving 80 patients who needed decisions to be made utilizing the PWP committee. We review the decisions required, the results of the shared decision-making meetings, and the patient outcomes. Our experience has shown that a protocol involving community volunteers to make decisions for PWPs in a timely manner is feasible and ethically defensible. The protocol has been accepted by physicians and utilized with increasing frequency. Because it was possible to gather at least minimal information on most patients, a standard of "informed best interest" was used to make decisions. PWP committee recommendations varied, but in all cases agreement was reached with the attending physicians.
机译:迄今为止,没有人鉴定或描述了在缺乏代理决策者的住院环境中遭受治疗的无能为力的患者的群体。尽管反复呼吁进行决策制定的协议,但有任何机构是否有关于使用此类议定书。 2005年,我们的城市高等教育医院利用伦理委员会的社区成员提供了一份议定书,与医疗提供者会面,并在没有代理(PWPS)的患者中参与共享决策。我们进行了回顾性图表审查,本文描述了近200名患者,根据协议在12年期间确定和处理。在激进的搜索之后,家庭成员位于令人惊讶的患者中,留下80名患者,需要采用PWP委员会进行决定。我们审查所需的决定,共享决策会议的结果以及患者结果。我们的经验表明,一个涉及社区志愿者的协议,以及时的方式为PWP做出决定是可行和道德辩护的。该协议已被医生接受并使用频率增加。因为有可能在大多数患者中收集至少最少的信息,所以使用了“知情最佳利益”的标准来做出决定。 PWP委员会建议各种各样的建议,但在所有案件中都与主治医生联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号