首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >FEASIBILITY OF USING PFC3D TO SIMULATE SOIL FLOW RESULTING FROM A SIMPLE SOIL-ENGAGING TOOL
【24h】

FEASIBILITY OF USING PFC3D TO SIMULATE SOIL FLOW RESULTING FROM A SIMPLE SOIL-ENGAGING TOOL

机译:使用PFC3D模拟简单土壤接合工具产生的土壤流动的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PFC3D is a discrete element modeling tool that has been used for simulations of soil-tool interaction in agriculture. However, existing studies have mainly focused on simulations of soil cutting forces, not soil flow. In this study, a soil-tool model was developed using the parallel bond model (PBM) of PFC3D to determine if the model could be used to simulate the soil flow characteristics resulting from a simple soil-engaging tool while satisfying the draft force prediction accuracy. In the simulations, soil was modeled as spherical particles with bonds between particles. The model outputs examined were the two most important soil dynamic properties: thrown-soil and draft force. By examining the effects of model microproperties on the simulated thrown-soil and draft force, we found that the feasible ranges of the model microproperties were: 1e4 to 5e6 Pa for the modulus of elasticity of particle, 1e5 to 1e8 Pa for the modulus of elasticity of bond, 1e4 to 1e5 Pa for bond strength, 0.3 to 0.7 for local damping coefficient, and 0 to 1.0 for viscous damping coefficient. For simulation of soil-tool interactions, the model microproperties should be selected within these feasible ranges. Otherwise, the behavior of the model particles would not reflect the behavior of real soil. Within these feasible ranges, the model outputs were influenced the most by the modulus of particle elasticity; the other model microproperties had little impact on the model outputs. Soil cutting tests were conducted in a sandy loam soil to evaluate the soil-tool model. The results showed that a modulus of particle elasticity of 2.5e5 Pa resulted in a good match between the simulated and measured draft forces. However, with this modulus, the simulated thrown-soil was significantly lower than the measured value. Further investigations showed that it may not be possible to match the simulated and measured thrown-soil using the PBM of PFC3D. Therefore, redefining the constitutive laws of particle contacts would be required to improve the accuracy of the model for simulations of soil flow behavior.
机译:PFC3D是一种离散元素建模工具,已用于农业土壤工具互动的模拟。然而,现有研究主要集中在土壤切削力的模拟,而不是土壤流动。在本研究中,使用PFC3D的平行粘合模型(PBM)开发了土壤工具模型,以确定该模型是否可用于模拟由简单的土壤接合工具产生的土壤流动特性,同时满足牵引力预测精度。 。在模拟中,土壤被建模为球形颗粒,颗粒之间的键合。所检查的模型输出是两种最重要的土壤动态特性:抛出土壤和牵引力。通过检查模型微振动在模拟抛出土壤和牵伸力上的影响,我们发现模型微振荡的可行范围为:1E4至5E6Pa,用于颗粒弹性模量,1E5至1E8Pa用于弹性模量粘合,1E4至1E5Pa用于粘合强度,局部阻尼系数为0.3至0.7,对于粘性阻尼系数为0至1.0。对于对土工具相互作用的仿真,应在这些可行的范围内选择模型微振荡。否则,模型颗粒的行为不会反映真土的行为。在这些可行的范围内,模型输出受到粒子弹性模量的影响;其他模型微振动物对模型输出没有影响。土壤切削试验在砂土土壤中进行,以评估土工具模型。结果表明,2.5E5Pa的颗粒弹性模量导致模拟和测量的牵伸力之间的良好匹配。然而,通过这种模量,模拟的抛出土壤显着低于测量值。进一步的研究表明,可能无法使用PFC3D的PBM匹配模拟和测量的抛出土壤。因此,需要重新定义粒子触点的本构规则,以提高模拟土壤流动行为模型的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号