...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >The Impact of Adding Sentinel Node Biopsy to Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
【24h】

The Impact of Adding Sentinel Node Biopsy to Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

机译:添加哨兵节点活检在机器人辅助自由基前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者生物化学复发中扩展盆腔淋巴结解剖的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The benefit of adding sentinel node biopsy (SNB) to extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot assisted radical prostatectomy and ePLND in prostate cancer patients, stratified by the application of SNB. The results were compared with the predictions of the updated Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. Methods: Between January 2006 and November 2016, 920 patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and ePLND with or without SNB (184 and 736 patients, respectively). BCR was defined as 2 consecutive prostate specific antigen rises of at least 0.2 ng/mL. The Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of BCR. Results: Median follow-up was 28 mo (interquartile range, 13-56.7 mo). The 5-y BCR-free survival rate was 80.5% and 69.9% in the ePLND+SNB and ePLND groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen level, primary Gleason grade greater than 3, seminal vesicle invasion, and higher number of removed and positive nodes were independent predictors of BCR in the ePLND group. In the ePLND+SNB group, only the number of positive nodes was an independent predictor of BCR. The overall accuracy of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram was higher in the ePLND+SNB than in the ePLND group. However, the nomogram was underestimating the probability of BCR-free status in the ePLND+SNB group, whereas the ePLND group was performing as predicted. Conclusion: Adding SNB to ePLND improves BCR-free survival, although the precise explanation of this observation remains speculative. Our results should be interpreted cautiously, given the nonrandomized nature and the selection bias of the study.
机译:将Sentinel节点活检(SNB)添加到扩展盆腔淋巴结解剖(EPLND)的益处仍然存在争议。我们的研究目的是评估机器人辅助自由基前列腺切除术和ePLND在前列腺癌患者中的生物化学复发(BCR),通过施用SNB分层。将结果与更新的纪念斯隆kettering癌症中心ROM图的预测进行了比较。方法:2006年1月至2016年11月,920名患者接受了机器人辅助的自由基前列腺切除术和EPLND,分别有或没有SNB(184和736名)。 BCR定义为2个连续前列腺特异性抗原至少0.2ng / ml。 Kaplan Meier方法和Cox回归分析用于识别BCR的预测因子。结果:中位后续行动是28 Mo(四分位数范围,13-56.7 Mo)。 EPLND + SNB和EPLND组的5-Y无BCR的存活率分别为80.5%和69.9%。在多变量分析中,特异性抗原水平,初级Gleason级大于3,精囊囊泡侵袭,更高的除去和阳性节点是EPLND组中BCR的独立预测因子。在EPLND + SNB组中,仅阳性节点的数量是BCR的独立预测因子。 EPLND + SNB中纪念Sloan Kettering Cancer Cents Cent Romg图中的整体准确性高于EPLND组。然而,NOM图低估了EPLND + SECB组中的BCR免疫图,而EPLND组正在按预测进行。结论:将SNB添加到EPLND上改善了不含BCR的生存,尽管该观察结果的确切解释仍然是投机性。鉴于非andomized性质和研究的选择偏见,我们的结果应谨慎地解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号