首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Artificial Intelligence >Influence of Wheat Establishment Techniques and Previous Kharif Season Crops on Productivity, Profitability, Water Use Efficiency, Energy Indices and Soil Properties in Central India
【24h】

Influence of Wheat Establishment Techniques and Previous Kharif Season Crops on Productivity, Profitability, Water Use Efficiency, Energy Indices and Soil Properties in Central India

机译:小麦建立技术与先前的kharif季节作物对印度中部生产率,盈利,水利用效率,能源指标及土壤性质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A three-year field study was conducted to explore the efficacy of wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop establishment techniques comprising conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), zero tillage (ZT) and broad bed furrow (BBF) after harvest of kharif (rainy) season crops of paddy (Oryza sativa), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan), pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucam) and cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). Pooled data showed that yield attributing characters and grain yield of wheat were significantly higher which was recorded under BBF followed by ZT, CT approximate to MT. Likewise significantly, higher grain yield was recorded after harvest of pigeon pea followed by pearl millet, paddy and cluster bean, respectively. Grain yield of wheat grown after previous kharif season crops was significantly higher under BBF after harvest of paddy, pigeon pea and pearl millet, whereas ZT proved to be better after harvest of cluster bean. The study revealed that BBF method saved maximum of US$ 101 ha(-1) followed by ZT (US$ 76 ha(-1)) and MT (US$ 43 ha(-1)) as compared with total cost of production under CT (US$ 497 ha(-1)). Net return was higher by 199 US$ ha(-1) with BBF and US$ 156 ha(-1) with ZT compared with CT (US$ 844 ha(-1)). Total water use by wheat was higher after cluster bean (38.6 cm) and least after paddy (35.7 cm). Total water use by wheat establishment techniques was 10.6 cm and 2.7 cm higher under CT compared with BBF and ZT, respectively. The delayed establishment of wheat after CT required more energy, while timely sown crop needed less energy and produced more energy, use efficiency and productivity of energy. After harvest of third crop of wheat, physicochemical properties significantly improved sown after pigeon pea compared to other kharif season crops. The overall improvement of physicochemical properties under BBF followed by ZT compared with MT and CT.
机译:进行了三年的田间研究以探讨小麦(Triticum Aestivum)作物建立技术的疗效,所述作物建立技术包括常规耕作(CT),最低耕作(MT),零耕作(ZT)和宽床沟(BBF)后kharif后(雨季)季节作物(Oryza Sativa),鸽子豌豆(Cajanus cajan),珍珠米(Pennisetum glaucam)和簇豆(Cyamopsis tetraganoloba)。汇总数据显示,在BBF下,小麦的产量归因于小麦的特征和谷物产量明显高于ZT,CT近似于MT。同样显着,分别在鸽子豌豆的收获后,分别记录较高的谷物产量,然后分别记录珍珠小米,稻谷和簇豆。在帕尔迪,鸽豌豆和珍珠小米的收获后,BBF后,在先前的Kharif季节作物后种植的粮食产量明显高,而ZT在收获豆豆后被证明会更好。该研究表明,BBF方法最多保存了101美元(-1),其次是ZT(76美元(-1美元))和MT(US $ 43公顷(-1)),与总产成本相比CT(497美元HA(-1))。净回报率较高了199美元(-1),BBF和156公顷(-1美元)与ZT相比,与CT相比(844美元(-1美元))。小麦的总用水在簇豆(38.6厘米)和垫子(35.7厘米)之后最少。与BBF和ZT相比,CT的小麦建立技术的总用水量为10.6厘米和2.7厘米。 CT需要更多的能量后延迟建立小麦,而当时播种的作物需要更少的能量,产生更多能量,使用能量效率和生产力。在鸽子豌豆后收获三种小麦的小麦,物理化学特性与其他kharif季节作物相比,鸽子豌豆播种显着改善。 BBF下的物理化学特性的总体改善与MT和CT相比ZT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号