首页> 外文期刊>Precision Agriculture >Carbon Sources in Riverine Food Webs: New Evidence from Amino Acid Isotope Techniques
【24h】

Carbon Sources in Riverine Food Webs: New Evidence from Amino Acid Isotope Techniques

机译:河流食品网中的碳源:来自氨基酸同位素技术的新证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A nearly 40-year debate on the origins of carbon supporting animal production in lotic systems has spawned numerous conceptual theories emphasizing the importance of autochthonous carbon, terrestrial carbon, or both (depending on river stage height). Testing theories has been hampered by lack of adequate analytical methods to distinguish in consumer tissue between ultimate autochthonous and allochthonous carbon. Investigators initially relied on assimilation efficiencies of gut contents and later on bulk tissue stable isotope analysis or fatty acid methods. The newest technique in amino acid, compound specific, stable isotope analysis (AA-CSIA), however, enables investigators to link consumers to food sources by tracing essential amino acids from producers to consumers. We used AA-CSIA to evaluate nutrient sources for 5 invertivorous and 6 piscivorous species in 2 hydrogeomorphically contrasting large rivers: the anastomosing Upper Mississippi River (UMR) and the mostly constricted lower Ohio River (LOR). Museum specimens we analyzed isotopically had been collected by other investigators over many decades (UMR: 1900-1969; LOR: 1931-1970). Our results demonstrate that on average algae contributed 58.5% (LOR) to 75.6% (UMR) of fish diets. The next highest estimated contributions of food sources were from C-3 terrestrial plants (21.1 and 11.5% for the LOR and UMR, respectively). Moreover, results from 11 individually examined species consistently demonstrated the importance of algae for most fish species in these trophic guilds. Differences among rivers in relative food source availability resulting from contrasting hydrogeomorphic complexity may account for relative proportions of amino acids derived from algae.
机译:关于汽油系统中碳生产的碳生产的起源的近40年争论已经产生了许多概念理论,强调了碳,陆地碳或两者的重要性(取决于河流阶段高度)。测试理论因缺乏足够的分析方法而受到阻碍,以区分最终的自身加重和表发碳之间的消费者组织。调查人员最初依赖于肠道内容物的同化效率,后来对散装组织稳定同位素分析或脂肪酸方法。然而,氨基酸,化合物特异性,稳定同位素分析(AA-CSIA)的最新技术使调查人员能够通过将生产者的必需氨基酸追溯到消费者来将消费者联系起来的食物来源。我们使用AA-CSIA在2个水管后勤对比的大型河流中评估5种无脾和6种氏品种的营养来源:吻合上部密西西比河(UMR)和主要收缩的下俄亥俄州河(LOR)。博物馆标本我们分析了同位性的其他调查人员在数十年中被其他调查人员收集(UMR:1900-1969; LOR:1931-1970)。我们的结果表明,平均藻类贡献了58.5%(LOR)至75.6%(UMR)的鱼类饮食。食物来源的下一个最高估计的贡献来自C-3陆生植物(分别为LOR和UMR的21.1和11.5%)。此外,11个单独检查的物种的结果一直证明了这些营养行会中大多数鱼类的藻类对大多数鱼类的重要性。对比水电片复杂性导致的相对食物源可用性中河流的差异可能涉及来自藻类衍生的氨基酸的相对比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号