首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >Adherence to All Steps of a Pain Management Protocol in Intensive Care Patients after Cardiac Surgery Is Hard to Achieve
【24h】

Adherence to All Steps of a Pain Management Protocol in Intensive Care Patients after Cardiac Surgery Is Hard to Achieve

机译:心脏手术后强化护理患者疼痛管理方案的所有步骤遵守难以实现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose. To investigate adherence to our pain protocol considering analgesics administration, number and timing of pain assessments, and adjustment of analgesics upon unacceptably high (NRS ≥ 4) and low (NRS ≤ 1) pain scores. Material and Methods. The pain protocol for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery consisted of automated prescriptions for paracetamol and morphine, automated reminders for pain assessments, a flowchart to guide interventions upon high and low pain scores, and reassessments after unacceptable pain. Results. Paracetamol and morphine were prescribed in all 124 patients. Morphine infusion was stopped earlier than protocolized in 40 patients (32%). During the median stay of 47 hours [IQR 26 to 74 hours], 702/706 (99%) scheduled pain assessments and 218 extra pain scores were recorded. Unacceptably high pain scores accounted for 96/920 (10%) and low pain scores for 546/920 (59%) of all assessments. Upon unacceptable pain additional morphine was administered in 65% (62/96) and reassessment took place in 15% (14/96). Morphine was not tapered in 273 of 303 (90%) eligible cases of low pain scores. Conclusions. Adherence to automated prescribed analgesics and pain assessments was good. Adherence to nonscheduled, flowchart-guided interventions was poor. Improving adherence may refine pain management and reduce side effects.
机译:目的。考虑到止痛议定书的依恋,考虑止痛药,疼痛评估的数量和时间,以及在不可接受的高(NRS≥4)和低(NRS≤1)疼痛分数上调整镇痛药。材料与方法。心脏手术后重症监护病房(ICU)患者的疼痛方案由扑热息痛和吗啡的自动处置,自动提醒疼痛评估,一个流程图,用于引导高低疼痛评分的干预,以及在不可接受的疼痛后重新评估。结果。所有124名患者中规定扑热息痛和吗啡。在40名患者中,吗啡输注早于综合(32%)。在47小时的中位入住期间[IQR 26至74小时],702/706(99%)预定的疼痛评估和218分记得额外的疼痛评分。不可接受的高疼痛评分占96/920(10%)和低疼痛评分,546/920(59%)所有评估。在不可接受的疼痛后,额外的吗啡在65%(62/96)中给药,并在15%(14/96)中进行重新评估。 Metphine在303中的273名(90%)符合低疼痛评分的含量均不逐渐变化。结论。坚持自动规定的镇痛药和疼痛评估是好的。依从非金融,流程图导游的干预措施差。改善粘附可能会改善疼痛管理并减少副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号