...
首页> 外文期刊>Stem cells international >Meta-Analysis and Evidence Base for the Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Cartilage Repair: Methodological Guidelines and Quality Assessment
【24h】

Meta-Analysis and Evidence Base for the Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Cartilage Repair: Methodological Guidelines and Quality Assessment

机译:膝关节软骨修复中自体骨髓间充质干细胞疗效的荟萃分析和证据基础:方法论指导和质量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study is to review all the published clinical trials on autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in the repair of cartilage lesions of the knee. We performed a comprehensive search in three electronic databases: PubMed, Medline via Ovid, and Web of Science. A systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA protocol and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The modified Coleman methodology score was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effect size for Pain and function change after receiving BM-MSCs. Thirty-three studies—including 724 patients of mean age 44.2 years—were eligible. 50.7% of the included patients received cultured BM-MSCs for knee cartilage repair. There was improvement in the MINORS quality score over time with a positive correlation with the publication year. Meta-analysis indicated better improvement and statistical significance in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain, IKDC Function, Tegner Activity Scale, and Lysholm Knee Score after administration of noncultured BM-MSCs when compared to evaluation before the treatment. Meanwhile, there was a clear methodological defect in most studies with an average modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) of 55. BM-MSCs revealed a clinically relevant improvement in pain, function, and histological regeneration.
机译:本研究的目的是在膝关节的软骨病变修复中审查自体骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSC)的所有公布的临床试验。我们在三个电子数据库中进行了全面的搜索:PubMed,Medline通过Ovid和Scient Web。根据PRISMA议定书和Cochrane手册进行系统审查,以获得干预措施的系统审查。修改的Coleman方法分数用于评估所包含的研究的质量。进行了荟萃分析以估计接受BM-MSCs后疼痛和功能变化的效果大小。三十三项研究 - 包括724名平均年龄为44.2岁的患者 - 有资格。 50.7%的包括患者接受培养的BM-MSCs用于膝关节软骨修复。未成年人质量分数随着时间的推移而有所改善,与出版年份正相关。与治疗前的评估相比,Meta分析表明疼痛,IKDC功能,TEGNER活动量表和Lysholm膝关节分数的视觉模拟规模中的更好提高和统计学显着性。同时,大多数研究中存在明显的方法缺陷,平均改良的Coleman方法评分(MCM)为55. BM-MSCs揭示了临床上相关的疼痛,功能和组织学再生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号