...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports health >Comparing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Treatment and Lumbar Stabilization Treatment on Pain and Movement Control in Patients With Low Back Pain
【24h】

Comparing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Treatment and Lumbar Stabilization Treatment on Pain and Movement Control in Patients With Low Back Pain

机译:比较认知功能治疗和腰椎稳定治疗对腰痛患者疼痛和运动控制的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP) should target both behavioral variables and physical performance factors. Hypothesis: Cognitive functional treatment (CFT) and lumbar stabilization treatment (LST) will result in positive changes in pain and lumbar movement control (LMC) in patients with LBP. Study Design: Pretest-posttest intervention. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: After screening, 52 participants (mean age, 44.3 ± 2.46 years) with chronic LBP were allocated into CFT (n = 17), LST (n = 17), or control (n = 18) groups. Pain and LMC were evaluated before and after 8 weeks of intervention with visual analog scale (VAS) and Luomajoki LMC battery tests, respectively. Results: Compared with baseline, pain and LMC were reduced and improved significantly in both groups after 8 weeks. However, the changes in both variables were not significantly different between groups. Percent change for pain between pretest and posttest values in the LST group was a decrease of 45% ( P = 0.003), compared with a decrease of 40% ( P = 0.003) in the CFT group. Change in LMC in the LST group was a decrease of 100% ( P = 0.026), compared with a decrease of 200% ( P = 0.018) in the CFT group. There as no change for both variables in the control group. Conclusion: Both CFT and LST groups improved LMC scores and reduced pain intensity. However, there was no difference between the 2 experimental groups on pain and LMC test results. Clinical Relevance: In this study, intended to construct an intervention for people with chronic LBP, the primary aims were to help individuals “make sense of their pain,” develop effective pain control strategies via body relaxation and extinction of safety behaviors, and adopt healthy lifestyle behaviors to affect cognitive factors known to affect pain sensitivity and disability. These primary aims were achieved through an emphasis on factors such as development of positive beliefs, reduced fear, increased awareness, enhanced understanding and control of pain, adaptive coping, enhanced self-efficacy, confidence, and improved mood through the class-based intervention.
机译:背景:慢性低背疼痛(LBP)的治疗应针对行为变量和物理性能因素。假设:认知功能治疗(CFT)和腰椎稳定治疗(LST)将导致LBP患者疼痛和腰椎运动控制(LMC)的正变化。研究设计:预测试后干预。证据水平:3级方法:筛选后,将52名参与者(平均年龄为44.3±2.46岁)分配给CFT(n = 17),LST(n = 17)或控制(n = 18)团体。在使用可视模拟量表(VAS)和Luomajoki LMC电池测试之前和8周之前和之后评估疼痛和LMC。结果:与基线相比,8周后,两组疼痛和LMC减少和改善。但是,两组之间的变量的变化在组之间没有显着差异。在LST组中预测试和后塔比值之间的疼痛变化百分比为45%(p = 0.003),而CFT组中的降低40%(p = 0.003)。 LST组中LMC的变化是100%(p = 0.026)的降低,而CFT组中的减少为200%(p = 0.018)。对照组中的变量没有更改。结论:CFT和LST组均改善LMC评分和降低疼痛强度。然而,2种实验组对疼痛和LMC测试结果没有差异。临床相关性:在这项研究中,旨在构建慢性LBP的人的干预,主要目的是帮助个人“理解他们的痛苦,”通过身体放松和安全行为的灭绝来发展有效的疼痛控制策略,并采用健康生活方式行为影响已知会影响疼痛敏感性和残疾的认知因素。这些主要目标是通过强调发展积极信仰,减少恐惧,提高意识,增强的痛苦,适应性应对,增强的自我效力,信心和改善情绪通过基于阶级的干预来实现这些主要目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号