首页> 外文期刊>AgroBorealis >Inventory of grasses along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline-1999
【24h】

Inventory of grasses along the Trans-Alaska Pipeline-1999

机译:横贯阿拉斯加管道1999年的草皮清单

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) right-of-way (ROW) permit is soon to expire. In 1999, BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. recruited a group of individuals to develop documents in preparation for the right-of-way renewal application. The objectivewas to assemble and synthesize existing information about the ROW. The revegetation topic was my assignment. Examining the revegetation information revealed a series of investigations over about a 10-year period. Route vegetation studies commenced beforepipeline construction began and largely ended about three years after oil started flowing through the pipeline. As I can best determine, the sequence of studies was: 1) Dr. William Mitchell conducted a plant ecological survey of the northern section ofthe proposed route for Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Mitchell 1970). 2) Alyeska Pipeline Service Company took 15,000 surface soil samples along the proposed route and prepared a fertilizer guide for revegetation based on laboratory tests (Hubbard 1980). 3) Johnson, Quinn and Brown investigated revegetation and erosion control practices at selected locations as the pipeline was being constructed (Johnson and others 1977). 1975-1978: L. Johnson observed revegetation treatments at 60 sites along the pipeline during construction (Johnson 1981). Summaries and improvement suggestions for a future natural gas transportation pipeline were included in Walker and others (1987). 1977 & 1979: A.W. Johnson and Kubanis inventoried weeds along TAPS route from Yukon River north to Prudhoe Bay (Kubanis 1980, Johnson and Kubanis 1980). 1979&1980: Native Plants, Inc. of Salt Lake City, Utah examined revegetation results within the pipeline corridor, plant succession patterns outside the corridor, and mycorrhizae onvarious plant species along TAPS route from Prudhoe Bay to Delta Junction (Native Plants, Inc. 1980a, 1980b and undated). These studies were sponsored by Northwest Pipeline Company for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS). A revegetationrecommendation for Northwest Pipeline Company was produced. For the past 20 years there appears to have been no published comprehensive inventory of the vegetation growing throughout the right-of-way with respect to revegetation success or failure. Obvious questions for a permit renewal are: 1) What are the current vegetation conditions along the corridor? 2) Which of the seeded species used in the revegetation program has persisted? 3) If seeded species are persisting, where do they occur? During the summer of 1999, we undertook a survey of the vegetation along the TAPS corridor from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez to acquire answers to these and related questions. All vascular plant life forms were inventoried. There were no natural grasslands throughout the pipeline route. Yet grass species were seeded for revegetation because grass seeds were available and because grasses have desirable features to protect soils from accelerated erosion. Alyeska Pipeline Service Company also used willow cuttings and transplanted trees and shrubs at a few select locations.
机译:跨阿拉斯加管道系统(TAPS)的通行权(ROW)许可即将到期。在1999年,BP Exploration(阿拉斯加)公司招募了一组人员来开发文档,以准备路权续期申请。目的是收集和综合有关ROW的现有信息。植被主题是我的任务。检查植被信息后,我们进行了大约10年的一系列调查。路线植被研究是在管道建设开始之前就开始的,并且在石油开始流经管道大约三年后就基本结束了。我可以最好地确定,研究的顺序是:1)William Mitchell博士对Alyeska管道服务公司(Mitchell 1970)提议的路线的北部进行了植物生态调查。 2)Alyeska管道服务公司沿提议的路线抽取了15,000个表层土壤样本,并根据实验室测试为植被恢复准备了肥料指南(Hubbard,1980年)。 3)约翰逊,奎因和布朗在管道建造过程中调查了选定地点的植被和侵蚀控制实践(Johnson等人,1977)。 1975年至1978年:L。Johnson在施工过程中沿管道的60个位置观察了植被恢复处理(Johnson 1981)。 Walker等人(1987年)对未来的天然气运输管道进行了总结和改进。 1977年和1979年:A.W。约翰逊(Johnson)和库班尼斯(Kubanis)沿TAPS路线从育空河北部到普拉德霍湾(Prudhoe Bay)清查了杂草(Kubanis 1980,Johnson and Kubanis 1980)。 1979和1980年:犹他州盐湖城的Native Plants,Inc.研究了管道走廊内的植被恢复结果,走廊外的植物演替模式以及从Prudhoe湾到Delta交界处的TAPS路线上的各种菌根(Native Plants,Inc. 1980a, 1980b和未注明日期)。这些研究是由西北管道公司赞助的阿拉斯加天然气运输系统(ANGTS)。提出了西北管道公司的植被恢复建议。在过去的20年中,似乎没有公开的关于植被成功与否的通行道路上生长的植被的综合清单。续签许可证的明显问题是:1)走廊目前的植被状况如何? 2)植被恢复计划中使用的哪些播种物种已经持续存在? 3)如果播种物种持续存在,它们会在哪里发生?在1999年夏季,我们对从Prudhoe湾到Valdez的TAPS走廊沿线的植被进行了调查,以获取这些问题和相关问题的答案。清查所有维管植物的生命形式。整个管线中没有天然草原。然而,草种被播种用于植被恢复,因为可获得草种子,并且草具有保护土壤免受加速侵蚀的理想特性。 Alyeska管道服务公司还在一些特定地点使用了柳树插条和移植的树木和灌木。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号