...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science and Plant Nutrition >Effects of inhibitors and biochar on nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and plant nitrogen uptake from urine patches of grazing animals on grasslands: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Effects of inhibitors and biochar on nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and plant nitrogen uptake from urine patches of grazing animals on grasslands: a meta-analysis

机译:抑制剂和生物炭对草原放牧动物尿液中氮氧化物排放,硝酸盐浸出和植物氮吸收的影响:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Excreta (urine and dung) patches on grazed grasslands are significant sources of nitrogen (N) trace gas emissions and leaching. Nitrification inhibitors (NIs), urease inhibitors (UIs) and biochar have been tested to reduce N losses and increase N utilization in various agro-ecosystems. Although the effectiveness of NIs, UIs or biochar on N losses or N utilization for chemical N fertilizers and manures have been evaluated in previous studies, there has been no comprehensive assessment on their effectiveness for excreta patches of grazing animals on grassland. This study thus aims to better understand the effects of inhibitors and biochar on the major N dynamics in excreta patches. Thus, we analyzed the results of 44 studies (156, 65, 67, and 97 comparisons of N2O emissions, NO3- leaching, plant N uptake, and plant yields, respectively) to evaluate the effects of additives on N losses and uptake from excreta patches. Our results showed that compared with urine patches without additives, pyrazole derivatives (a NI), N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT, a UI), and biochar did not affect N2O emissions, whereas dicyandiamide (DCD, a NI) and a combination of NBPT and DCD (NBPT + DCD) significantly reduced emissions by 51% and 48%, respectively. DCD and NBPT + DCD also significantly reduced NO3- leaching (46% and 42%, respectively), and increased plant N uptake (14% and 15%, respectively) and plant yields (7% and 12%, respectively). Our findings suggest that the application of DCD was effective in decreasing N losses and increasing N utilization from urine patches, but NBPT + DCD would be a better option, in order to avoid the potential increases in ammonia emissions following DCD application. However, the potential adverse impacts and economic viability of using the inhibitors should be evaluated fully before their large-scale application.
机译:放牧草原上的excreta(尿液和粪便)斑块是氮气(n)痕量气体排放和浸出的重要来源。已经测试了硝化抑制剂(NIS),脲酶抑制剂(UIS)和生物炭,以降低N损失并增加各种农业生态系统的利用率。虽然在先前的研究中评估了NIS,UIS或BioChar对N损失或N型肥料和植物的利用的有效性,但对其对草原放牧动物的excreta斑块的有效性没有全面评估。因此,本研究旨在更好地了解抑制剂和生物炭对排泄物斑块的主要N动态的影响。因此,我们分析了44项研究的结果(156,65,67和97个N2O排放,No3-浸出,植物N吸收和植物产量的结果,以评估添加剂对eNcreta的损失和摄取的影响补丁。我们的结果表明,与没有添加剂的尿液贴片,吡唑衍生物(Ni),N-(正丁基)硫磷(Nbpt,UI)和生物炭没有影响N2O排放,而DCYANDIDIDAL(DCD,NI)的磷酸Nbpt和DCD(Nbpt + DCD)的组合分别减少了51%和48%的排放。 DCD和Nbpt + DCD也显着降低了No3浸出(分别为46%和42%),并且植物N摄取(分别为14%和15%)和植物产量(分别为7%和12%)。我们的研究结果表明,DCD的应用有效降低N损失并增加尿贴片的使用,但Nbpt + DCD将是更好的选择,以避免在DCD应用后氨排放潜在增加。然而,应在大规模应用之前完全评估使用抑制剂的潜在不利影响和经济可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号