...
首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Re: Caution urged in interpreting a negative study of cannabis use and schizophrenia: A response to Dr. Christine Miller
【24h】

Re: Caution urged in interpreting a negative study of cannabis use and schizophrenia: A response to Dr. Christine Miller

机译:RE:谨慎敦促解释对大麻使用和精神分裂症的负面研究:对Christine Miller博士的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On behalf of my co-authors, I thank Dr. Miller for her thoughtful comments about our study (Proal et al., 2014). However, her title is quite misleading in that it implies that our study was "negative" and that we were simply reporting that cannabis does not "cause" schizophrenia. This is not so; unfortunately one sentence in the conclusion was taken out of context and as such was misleading. Our study was a family study of people who did and did not abuse cannabis as adolescents. There were 4 groups: non-psychotic individuals who did and did not abuse cannabis and people with schizophrenia who did and did not abuse cannabis prior to their illness. What the main study analysis showed was that those individuals who developed schizophrenia after cannabis use in adolescence had a significantly greater family history of schizophrenia than those who used cannabis and did not develop schizophrenia and an elevated family history no different than those with schizophrenia who never used cannabis. These results suggest that the key element for determining whether someone develops schizophrenia after cannabis use is an elevated genetic risk.
机译:代表我的共同作者,我感谢Miller博士关于我们的学习评论(Proal等,2014)。然而,她的头衔是非常误导的,因为它意味着我们的研究是“消极的”,我们只是报告大麻不会“引起”精神分裂症。这不是那么;不幸的是,结论中的一个句子被淘汰出失去,因此误导了。我们的研究是对那些做的人的家庭研究,并没有滥用大麻作为青少年。有4组:非精神病的人,他做过并没有滥用大麻和有精神分裂症的人,他在疾病之前没有滥用大麻。主要研究分析显示的是,在青春期大麻使用后开发精神分裂症的个体具有比使用大麻的人具有明显更大的精神分裂症的家族史,并且没有发展精神分裂症和升高的家庭历史与从未使用的精神分裂症的家族史没有什么不同大麻。这些结果表明,用于确定有人在大麻使用后如何发展精神分裂症的关键要素是升高的遗传风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号