...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic surgery >Comparison of AO Titanium Locking Plate and Screw Fixation versus Anterograde Intramedullary Fixation for Isolated Unstable Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures
【24h】

Comparison of AO Titanium Locking Plate and Screw Fixation versus Anterograde Intramedullary Fixation for Isolated Unstable Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures

机译:AO钛锁定板和螺钉固定与孤立不稳定性髓间骨折和鳞片骨折的螺钉固定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of AO titanium locking plate and screw (ATLPS) and anterograde intramedullary (AIM) fixation for treating unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Methods: Adult patients with isolated fresh unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled into this prospective study from July 2013. Patients were divided into ATLPS or AIM groups when they were admitted to our department after considering their work requirement, fracture complexity, and surgeon's experience and were then treated accordingly. Relevant demographic, clinical and preoperative clinical data were collected and analyzed. Clinical examination and radiograph evaluation were performed 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, total range of motion (ROM) of the injured digit, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (Quick-DASH) and grip strength (percentage of the contralateral corresponding digit). Results: From July 2013 to September 2014, 76 patients were treated by AIM and 71 by ATLPS. Age, sex, time from injury to operation, dominant hand, injury mechanism, fracture location, fracture type and participant occupation were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Operations were all performed well and followed by uneventful postoperative functional recoveries. At 3-month follow-up, all clinical outcomes were significantly better in the AIM than ATLPS group (P < 0.05) except for VAS pain scores. However, at 6-month follow-up, the differences were no longer significant, indicating similar results for both types of fixation. Patients in the AIM group developed significantly more complications (P = 0.037). Sick leave was significantly longer in the AIM group (P = 0.02). Conclusions: AIM outperforms ATLPS in the treatment of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in the early, but not the later, postoperative period; the latter is associated with significantly more complications. Patients treated by ATLPS require shorter sick leave, which is of particular benefit to workers with specialized manual skills.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较AO钛锁定板和螺杆(ATLPS)和闭合髓内(AIM)固定的临床和放射辐射结果,用于治疗不稳定的髓质和鳞片状骨折。方法:符合纳入标准的孤立新鲜不稳定性胞浆和痰骨折的成年患者于2013年7月纳入了这项前瞻性研究。在考虑其工作要求后,患者分为临时的ATLPS或AIM集团,骨折复杂和外科医生的经历,然后相应地对待。收集和分析了相关人口,临床和术前临床数据。术后1周和1,3和6个月进行临床检查和X型射线照片。结果措施是视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛,总运动范围(ROM)的受伤的数字,臂,肩部快速,肩部的快速(快速划线)和握力(对侧对侧的百分比)数字)。结果:2013年7月至2014年9月,76名患者由AIM和ATLPS进行71名。年龄,性别,从伤害到操作的时间,占主导地手,伤害机制,骨折位置,断裂型和参与者职业在两组中相似(P> 0.05)。运营均良好,其次是术后术语功能恢复。在3个月的随访中,除了VAS疼痛评分外,所有临床结果都比ATLPS组(P <0.05)显着更好。但是,在6个月的随访时,差异不再重要,表明两种类型的固定结果类似。 AIM组的患者显着的并发症显着增加(P = 0.037)。目的群体中病假明显更长(P = 0.02)。结论:旨在在早期治疗不稳定的髓质和骨脉搏骨折的atlps,但不是后期的术后期间;后者与显着的并发症有关。 ATLPS治疗的患者需要更短的病假,这对具有专门的手工技能的工人特别有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号