首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Investor >RISK-ON,OR RISK-OFF?
【24h】

RISK-ON,OR RISK-OFF?

机译:风险,或冒险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Zigzagging a path through recent trade friction and geopolitics has often been bewildering.Is market sentiment for the day”risk-on”or”risk-off? A Wall Street Journal article likened the”risk-on,risk-off”phenomenon to market forces being split into two buckets.One has”haven assets”that rally when investors”grow skittish.”The other has”growth assets”that rally as”risk appetite returns.”To state the obvious,commodities like oil are not risk-off or haven assets.And”skittish”is likely an understatement of energy investors’mood.A recent Simmons Energy note detected some”increased investor scrutiny in assessing risk/reward”in energy.However,it noted”the complexity factor has never been higher as multiple externalities continue to drive a wide range of outcomes.”According to the Simmons note,gener-alist investors have set a high bar to consider returning to energy.E&Ps’ability to generate a free-cash-flow(FCF)yield is a”threshold requirement,”and a FCF yield in line with that of the S&P is targeted.”Given the weak competitive structure of the upstream industry and the prolonged legacy of underperformance,”the Simmons note said,”generalists increasingly require minimum FCF yields of about 5% and a persuasive line of sight to low double digits.”
机译:通过最近的贸易摩擦和地缘政治曲折的道路往往令人困惑。当天的市场情绪“风险”或“冒险?华尔街日报文章将市场力量分成两家桶的“风险,冒险”现象。当投资者“生长的香气”时,一连串的“避风港资产”。另一个有“增长资产”的集会作为“风险偏好回报”。为了说明这种明显的,石油这样的商品不是冒险或避风港资产。“Skittish”可能是对能源投资者的轻描淡写。最近的Simmons能量票据发现了一些“增加投资者审查”评估风险/奖励“在能量中。然而,它指出”随着多个外部性的复杂性因素从未如此越来越高兴地推动各种结果。“根据SIMMONS注意,GENS-Alist投资者已经设定了一个高酒吧才能考虑返回Energy.e&Ps'ability以产生自由现金流量(FCF)产量是“阈值要求”,并且符合标准普尔的FCF产量是针对性的。“鉴于上游行业的竞争性结构较弱和延长的遗产表现不佳,“Simmons说明,”属列出越来越需要最小的FCF产量约为5%,并且有说服力的视线到低两位数。“

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号