首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >STAR - People-powered prioritization: A 21st-century solution to allocation headaches
【24h】

STAR - People-powered prioritization: A 21st-century solution to allocation headaches

机译:明星 - 人民动力的优先级:21世纪的分配解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is to inform the allocation of scarce resources. CEA is routinely used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of specific health technologies by agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. But there is extensive evidence that because of barriers of accessibility and acceptability, CEA has not been used by local health planners in their annual task of allocating fixed budgets to a wide range of types of health care. This paper argues that these planners can use Socio Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) for that task. STAR builds on the principles of CEA and the practice of program budgeting and marginal analysis. STAR uses requisite models to assess the cost-effectiveness of all interventions considered for resource reallocation by explicitly applying the theory of health economics to evidence of scale, costs, and benefits, with deliberation facilitated through an interactive social process of engaging key stakeholders. In that social process, the stakeholders generate missing estimates of scale, costs, and benefits of the interventions; develop visual models of their relative cost-effectiveness; and interpret the results. We demonstrate the feasibility of STAR by showing how it was used by a local health planning agency of the English National Health Service, the Isle of Wight Primary Care Trust, to allocate a fixed budget in 2008 and 2009.
机译:成本效益分析(CEA)的目的是通知稀缺资源的配置。 CEA经常用于评估国家健康和威尔士国家国家健康和临床(漂亮)等机构的特定健康技术的成本效益。但是,由于可访问性和可接受性的障碍,当地卫生规划者在将固定预算分配到广泛类型的医疗保健的年度任务中,CEA尚未使用CEA。本文认为,这些规划人员可以使用社会技术分配资源(Star)为该任务。明星建立在CEA的原则和方案预算和边际分析的实践中。明星利用必要的模型来评估通过明确地将卫生经济学理论与规模,成本和福利的证据明确应用于规模,成本和福利的证据,通过互动社会进程的互动社会进程来评估所考虑的资源重新分配的所有干预措施的成本效益。在这一社会过程中,利益相关者产生了缺少的衡量规模,成本和干预措施的估计;开发其相对成本效益的视觉模型;并解释结果。我们展示了明星的可行性,展示了当地健康规划机构如何被英国国家卫生服务,机智初级保健信托岛的岛屿,在2008年和2009年分配固定预算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号