首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Narrow-Band Imaging Magnifying Endoscopy versus Lugol Chromoendoscopy with Pink-Color Sign Assessment in the Diagnosis of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial
【24h】

Narrow-Band Imaging Magnifying Endoscopy versus Lugol Chromoendoscopy with Pink-Color Sign Assessment in the Diagnosis of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Neoplasms: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial

机译:窄带成像放大镜内窥镜与Lugol色调镜检查粉红色符号评估,诊断浅表食管肿瘤肿瘤肿瘤:随机性非事实体试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies have shown the high diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) and Lugol chromoendoscopy with pink-color sign assessment (LCE-PS) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). However, there has been no controlled trial comparing these two diagnostic techniques. We conducted a randomized noninferiority trial to compare the diagnostic accuracy of NBI-ME and LCE-PS. We recruited patients with, or with a history of, squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region or in the esophagus. They were randomly assigned to either NBI-ME or LCE-PS. When lesions >5mm in diameter were found as brownish areas on NBI or as Lugol-voiding lesions (LVL), they were evaluated to determine whether they are SESCC on the basis of the findings of NBI-ME or PS in the LVL. NBI-ME and LCE-PS were completed in 147 patients each. There was no significant difference in all diagnostic values between the two techniques. Compared with LCEPS, NBI-ME showed a significantly shorter examination time but a larger number of misdiagnosed lesions especially in patients with many irregularly shaped multiform LVLs. Compared with LCE-PS, NBI-ME might be similarly accurate and less invasive, but less reliable in patients with many LVLs, in the diagnosis of SESCC.
机译:以前的研究表明,窄带成像放大内窥镜(NBI-ME)和Lugol型微镜检查的高诊断准确性,具有粉红色的符号评估(LCE-PS),用于浅表食管鳞状细胞癌(SESCC)。但是,没有控制试验比较这两个诊断技术。我们进行了一项随机的非流动性试验,以比较NBI-ME和LCE-PS的诊断准确性。我们招募了患有头部和颈部区域或食道的鳞状细胞癌的患者。它们被随机分配给NBI-ME或LCE-PS。当在Nbi或褐色区域发现直径为褐色区域或作为Lugol-voiding病变(LV1)时,评估它们以确定它们是否在LV1中的Nbi-ME或PS的结果的基础上确定它们是否是SESCC的。 NBI-ME和LCE-PS在147名患者中完成。两种技术之间的所有诊断价值都没有显着差异。与LCEP相比,NBI-ME显示出显着较短的检查时间,但误诊的损伤量较多,特别是在许多不规则形状的多种多形状LVL的患者中。与LCE-PS相比,NBI-ME可能类似地准确,侵入性较少,但在许多LVL的患者中,在SESCC的诊断中,患者较少可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号