首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Prognostication of neurologic outcome in cardiac arrest patients after mild therapeutic hypothermia: A meta-analysis of the current literature
【24h】

Prognostication of neurologic outcome in cardiac arrest patients after mild therapeutic hypothermia: A meta-analysis of the current literature

机译:轻度治疗低温后心脏滞尿病患者神经系统结果的预测:当前文献的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To assess the sensitivity and false positive rate (FPR) of neurological examination and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to predict poor outcome in adult patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for cohort studies describing the association of clinical neurological examination or SSEPs after return of spontaneous circulation with neurological outcome. Poor outcome was defined as severe disability, vegetative state and death. Sensitivity and FPR were determined. Results: A total of 1,153 patients from ten studies were included. The FPR of a bilaterally absent cortical N20 response of the SSEP could be calculated from nine studies including 492 patients. The SSEP had an FPR of 0.007 (confidence interval, CI, 0.001-0.047) to predict poor outcome. The Glasgow coma score (GCS) motor response was assessed in 811 patients from nine studies. A GCS motor score of 1-2 at 72 h had a high FPR of 0.21 (CI 0.08-0.43). Corneal reflex and pupillary reactivity at 72 h after the arrest were available in 429 and 566 patients, respectively. Bilaterally absent corneal reflexes had an FPR of 0.02 (CI 0.002-0.13). Bilaterally absent pupillary reflexes had an FPR of 0.004 (CI 0.001-0.03). Conclusions: At 72 h after the arrest the motor response to painful stimuli and the corneal reflexes are not a reliable tool for the early prediction of poor outcome in patients treated with hypothermia. The reliability of the pupillary response to light and the SSEP is comparable to that in patients not treated with hypothermia.
机译:目的:评估神经检查的敏感性和假阳性率(FPR)和躯体感应诱发的潜在(SSEPS)预测心肺复苏后治疗患者治疗的成人患者的差异差异(CPR)。方法:搜查了群组和embase用于队列研究,描述临床神经检查或SSEP与神经循环恢复后的临床神经检查或SSEPS。结果不佳被定义为严重的残疾,植物州和死亡。确定敏感性和FPR。结果:共有1,153名从十项研究患者。 SSEP的双侧不存在皮质N20响应的FPR可以根据包括492名患者的九项研究计算。 SSEP的FPR为0.007(置信区间,CI,0.001-0.047),以预测差的结果。来自九项研究的811名患者评估了Glasgow Coma得分(GCS)电机响应。 72小时的GCS电机得分为1-2,具有0.21(CI 0.08-0.43)的高FPR。在429和566名患者中可获得逮捕后72小时的角膜反射和瞳孔反应性。双侧不存在的角膜反射具有0.02(CI 0.002-0.13)的FPR。双侧缺乏瞳孔反射的FPR为0.004(CI 0.001-0.03)。结论:在逮捕运动后72小时,对疼痛刺激的响应,角膜反射不是一种可靠的工具,即早期预测患者患者治疗的患者的差。对光的瞳孔反应和SSEP的可靠性与未用体温过低治疗的患者相当。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intensive care medicine》 |2013年第10期|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Intensive Care Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Geert Grooteplein zuid;

    Department of Intensive Care Academic Medical Center Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam 1105 AZ;

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine Faculty of Biology and Medicine Lausanne University;

    Department of Neurology 200 First St. S.W. Rochester MN 55905 United States;

    Deparment of Intensive Care Medicine/Nephrology Charité Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Augustenburger;

    Department of Clinical Sciences Sk?ne University Hospital Lund University 22363 Lund Sweden;

    Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford University Medical Center 780 Welch Road Palo;

    Department of Radiology Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 13th Street CNY;

    Department of Intensive Care Academic Medical Center Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam 1105 AZ;

    Department of Intensive Care Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Geert Grooteplein zuid;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 护理学;
  • 关键词

    Cardiac arrest; Prognostication; SSEP; Therapeutic hypothermia;

    机译:心脏骤停;预后;SSEP;治疗体温过低;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号