首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Cost effectiveness of two therapeutic regimens of infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: economic evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

Cost effectiveness of two therapeutic regimens of infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: economic evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.

机译:脊柱型脊柱膜炎中英夫利昔单抗两种治疗方案的成本效益:随机对照试验中的经济评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of two therapeutic regimens of infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: 230 patients with active AS who were participating in a randomised controlled trial comparing two infliximab infusion modalities-every 6 weeks (Q6) and on demand (DEM)-were included in an economic evaluation within the trial. Data were collected by phone every 3 months for 1 year. Direct and indirect costs were calculated from a payer perspective. Health-related quality of life was assessed with a general health rating scale. ICERs were calculated for one 20% improvement (ASAS20), for one partial remission and for one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: The Q6 regimen was significantly more efficacious than the DEM regimen but also more costly (euro22 388 vs euro17 596; p<0.001), because it required significantly more infliximab infusions per patient (8.4 vs 6.2). The ICERs of the Q6 to DEM regimen were euro15 841 for one ASAS20 response, euro23 296 for one partial remission and euro50 760 for one QALY gained. CONCLUSION: The administration of infliximab every 6 weeks is cost effective as compared with a DEM regimen; however, the ICER is close to the acceptability threshold of euro50 000 for one QALY gained. Trial registration number: NCT 00439283.
机译:目的:确定脊柱型脊柱炎(AS)的两种治疗inciximab治疗方案的增量成本效力比率(ins)。方法:230例活跃患者参与随机对照试验的一项可随机对照试验,比较两种英夫利昔单抗输注方式 - 每6周(Q6)和按需(DEM) - 在审判中的经济评估中纳入。数据通过电话收集,每3个月收集1年。直接和间接成本从付款人的角度来计算。与一般健康评级规模评估了与健康有关的生活质量。患者被计算为20%改善(ASAS20),用于一个部分缓解和一个质量调整的终身年度(QALY)获得。结果:Q6方案比DEM方案更具效率,而且更昂贵(EURO22 388 VS17 596; P <0.001),因为它需要每位患者的更多英特里昔单抗输注(8.4 Vs 6.2)。 Q6至DEM方案的叙述是一个ASAS20响应的欧洲15841,欧元23欧元296欧元,用于一个Qaly的一个部分缓解和欧洲50760。结论:与DEM方案相比,每6周给药每6周的每6周给药都是成本效益;但是,转换器接近一个获得的QALY欧洲50 000的可接受性阈值。试验登记号码:NCT 00439283。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号