首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Trial of Therapeutic Assessment in London: randomised controlled trial of Therapeutic Assessment versus standard psychosocial assessment in adolescents presenting with self-harm.
【24h】

Trial of Therapeutic Assessment in London: randomised controlled trial of Therapeutic Assessment versus standard psychosocial assessment in adolescents presenting with self-harm.

机译:伦敦治疗评估试验:随机对照试验治疗评估与自我危害的青少年的标准心理社会评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Therapeutic Assessment (TA) versus assessment as usual (AAU) improves engagement with follow-up in adolescents presenting with self-harm. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with 3 months naturalistic follow-up. SETTING: Child and adolescent mental health services in two London National Health Service Trusts. PARTICIPANTS: 26 clinicians randomised into TA and AAU groups recruited 70 newly referred adolescents with self-harm. INTERVENTIONS: TA, a manualised procedure including a basic psychosocial assessment and a 30 min therapeutic intervention; AAU, standard psychosocial assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attendance at the first follow-up session; number of the follow-up sessions attended and changes in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Children's Global Assessment Scale scores. All measures were adjusted for clustering, social class, changes of therapist and previous contact with services. RESULTS: Using the data on all participants (n=70), those in the TA group were significantly more likely to attend the first follow-up appointment: 29 (83%) versus 17 (49%), OR 5.12, 95% CI (1.49 to 17.55) and more likely to attend four or more treatment sessions: 14 (40%) versus 4 (11%), OR 5.19, 95% CI (2.22 to 12.10). Three months after the initial assessment there were no statistically significant differences between the groups on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores: 15.6 versus 16.0, mean difference -0.37, 95% CI (-3.28 to 2.53) or Children's Global Assessment Scale scores: 64.6 versus 60.1, mean difference 4.49, 95% CI (-0.98 to 9.96). CONCLUSIONS: TA was associated with statistically significant improvement in engagement. TA could be usefully applied at the point of initial assessment for adolescents with self-harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 81605131 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN81605131/.
机译:目的:判断治疗性评估(TA)与通常(AAU)的评估是否改善了与自我危害的青少年随访的参与。设计:随机对照试验,拥有3个月的自然主义随访。环境:两个伦敦国家卫生服务信托的儿童和青少年心理健康服务。参与者:26名临床医生随机进入TA和AAU集团招募了70名新推荐的青少年,具有自我危害。干预措施:TA,一项手术程序,包括基本的心理社会评估和30分钟治疗干预; AAU,标准的心理社会评估。主要观察措施:首次出席第一次后续会议;随访课程的数量出席和改变优势和困难问卷和儿童全球评估规模分数。针对聚类,社会阶层,治疗师的变化以及之前接触服务的所有措施。结果:使用所有参与者的数据(n = 70),TA组中的数据更有可能参加第一次后续预约:29(83%)与17(49%)或5.12,95%CI (1.49至17.55),更有可能出席四次或更多的治疗会议:14(40%)与4(11%)或5.19,95%CI(2.22至12.10)。初步评估三个月后,在优势和困难的群体中没有统计学上存在统计学意义的问卷评分:15.6与16.0,平均差异-0.37,95%CI(-3.28至2.53)或儿童全球评估规模分数:64.6与60.1 ,平均差异4.49,95%CI(-0.98至9.96)。结论:TA与统计上有关的接合有关。在具有自我危害的青少年的初步评估中,可以有效地应用。审判注册:ISRCTN 81605131 http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn81605131/。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号