首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal imaging. >The diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy in the early detection and evaluation of bladder carcinoma: Comparison with conventional cystoscopy
【24h】

The diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy in the early detection and evaluation of bladder carcinoma: Comparison with conventional cystoscopy

机译:多种传感器计算机断层扫描的诊断准确性与多平面重新格料成像和虚拟膀胱镜检查的早期检测和评估膀胱癌:与常规膀胱镜检查的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy (VC) in early detection and evaluation of bladder masses with comparison with conventional cystoscopic findings. Materials and methods: This prospective study included 35 patients with suspected bladder cancer were studied by computed tomographic cystography (CTC) and virtual cystography (VC) in both the supine and prone positions after distending the bladder with air. The patient population was divided into three groups based on lesion size at conventional cystoscopy (CC). Results of the CT study were compared with those of CC. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value was used to study the association between VC and CC as regarding lesion detection. Results: The size of the tumors varied from 2 mm to occupying more than three quarters of the bladder. Of the 71 lesions detected on CC, 47 lesions were positive in histopathology, 28 were <4 mm (19 were positive and 9 were negative for neoplasia), and four of these were missed on VC, with one of 3 mm missed on CC and correctly located by VC. Thus, all lesions of >4 mm were detected by VC and 24 of 28 <4 mm. The locations of all were correctly described at VC when compared with CC. The overall sensitivity of VC vs. CC was 94.36%, specificity 71.42%, PPV was 97.1%, and NPV was 55.55%. Conclusion: Cystoscopy remains the standard of reference for the evaluation of the urinary bladder, but MDCT is indicated for examination of patients on whom CC is contraindicated, difficult to perform, unsatisfactory in interpretation, and as an adjuvant tool in the evaluation of areas difficult to assess with CC.
机译:目的:为了与现有的膀胱镜发现比较评估多检测器计算机化断层显像(MDCT),在早期检测和膀胱群众的评价多平面重新格式化的成像和虚拟膀胱镜(VC)的诊断准确性。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究包括35例怀疑膀胱癌通过在仰卧和肿胀与空气囊后俯卧位两者计算机断层膀胱造影(CTC)和虚拟膀胱造影(VC)的研究。患者群体被分成基于在常规膀胱镜检查(CC)病变大小三组。在CT研究结果与CC进行比较。主要观察指标:灵敏度,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值被用来研究VC和CC之间的关联作为关于病变的检出。结果:在2mm变化到占据囊的四分之三以上的肿瘤的大小。上CC检测到的71个病变,47个病变在组织病理学阳性,有28人<4毫米(19阳性,9是用于治疗肿瘤阴性),并且这四个被漏诊上VC,与错过了CC为3mm一个和正确定位的VC。因此,通过VC检测和的28 <4 24毫米>4毫米所有病变。所有的位置时与CC相比被正确的VC描述。 VC与CC的整体灵敏度为94.36%,特异性为71.42%,阳性预测值为97.1%,阴性预测值为55.55%。结论:膀胱镜检查仍然是对膀胱的评价参考标准,但MDCT的适应症是检查患者对谁CC是禁忌,难以执行,不满意解释,如在难以领域的评价的辅助工具与CC评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号