首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: Comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance
【24h】

Prostate-specific antigen as a biomarker of condom failure: Comparison of three laboratory assays and self-reported condom use problems in a randomized trial of female condom performance

机译:前列腺特异性抗原作为避孕套失败的生物标志物:三个实验室测定和自我报告的避孕套在女性安全套性能的随机试验中的情况下比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a biomarker for semen exposure, may provide a more objective measure of condom failure than subject self-reports. Methods for measuring PSA vary and their comparability with respect to assessing condom performance has not been adequately evaluated. This study compared results from three different PSA assays of vaginal samples collected by subjects in a randomized clinical trial which compared the performance of female condoms. Study Design: We selected 30 pairs of pre- and post-coital vaginal samples from subjects who reported condom functionality problems or whose original PSA assay was positive. Samples were retested using three different PSA assays [quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA), rocket immune-electrophoresis (RIE) and chromatographic immunoassay (CIA)]. We compared the proportion of condom uses where the post-coital PSA result indicated semen exposure for each of the three assays. Results: Despite varying levels of sensitivity, the results from all three assays were remarkably consistent. Self-reported condom failures did not correlate well with positive PSA results, suggesting that exclusive reliance on either PSA or user self-report may be inadequate for assessing condom functionality. Conclusion: In combination with user self-report of condom failure, PSA testing provides a reliable, objective marker of condom functionality. Studies based on PSA testing may improve on conventional contraceptive clinical trials by offering a more direct assessment of a condom product's ability to prevent semen exposure.
机译:背景:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)是精液暴露的生物标志物,可以提供比受试者自我报告更客观的避孕套失效量。测量PSA的方法变化,并且其对评估安全套性能的可比性尚未得到充分评估。该研究与随机临床试验中受试者收集的阴道样本中的三种不同PSA测定的比较结果比较了雌性避孕套的性能。研究设计:我们从报告安全套功能问题的受试者中选择了30对和谐阴道阴道样本,或者原始PSA测定是阳性的。使用三种不同的PSA测定来重新测试样品[定量酶联免疫测定(EIA),火箭免疫电泳(RIE)和色谱免疫测定(CIA)]。我们比较了CANDOM使用的比例,其中结合后PSA结果表明了三种测定中的每一个的精液暴露。结果:尽管有不同水平的敏感性,但所有三种测定的结果都是非常一致的。自我报告的避孕套故障与阳性PSA结果没有良好相关,这表明对PSA或用户自我报告的独有依赖可能不足以评估安全套功能。结论:与用户自我报告结合避孕型衰竭,PSA检测提供了安全避孕套功能的可靠性客观标记。基于PSA测试的研究可以通过提供更直接的评估安全套产品预防精液暴露的能力来改善常规避孕临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号