首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The D D etroit cardiogenic shock initiative
【24h】

Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The D D etroit cardiogenic shock initiative

机译:急性心肌梗死中早期机械循环支持的可行性,心肌休克复杂:D D etroit心源性休克措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective The ‘Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative’ is a single‐arm, multicenter study to assess the feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients who present with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods Between July 2016 and February 2017, 4 metro Detroit sites participated in the study. The centers agreed to treat patients with AMICS using a mutually agreed‐upon protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of MCS. Inclusion and exclusion criteria mimicked those from the ‘SHOCK’ trial with an additional exclusion criteria being use of intra‐aortic balloon pump counter pulsation prior to MCS. Results A total of 41 consecutive patients were included. Patients had an average age of 65?±?14 years, 71% were male and 59% of patients were admitted to the hospital in cardiogenic shock. Prior to receiving MCS, 93% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, 15% of patients had a witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest, 27% of patients had an in‐hospital cardiac arrest, and 17% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation while MCS was being implanted. In accordance to the protocol recommendation, 66% of patients had a MCS device inserted prior to PCI. Right heart catheterization and hemodynamic monitoring was performed in 83% of patients. Door to support times averaged 83?±?58 minutes and 71% of patients were able to reduce the levels of inotropes and vasopressors within the first 24‐hours of their index procedure. Pre‐procedure cardiac power output (CPO) was 0.57 W and post‐procedure CPO was 0.95 W, a 67% increase (p??0.001). Survival to explant for the entire cohort was 85% a significant improvement from institutional historical controls (85% vs 51% p??0.001) and survival to discharge was 76%. Conclusion Centers who adopted a regional shock protocol emphasizing the delivery of early MCS with invasive hemodynamic monitoring can achieve rapid door to support times and can improve survival in patients who present with AMICS. Larger national studies will be needed to further validate this pilot feasibility study.
机译:摘要目的“底特律心源性休克倡议”是一种单臂,多中心的研究,以评估患有急性心肌梗死的患者早期机械循环支持(MCS)的可行性,该患者通过经过经皮冠状动脉干预的心形成休克(AMIC)。方法2016年7月至2017年2月,4位Metro底特律网站参加了该研究。这些中心同意使用相互达成的协议治疗AMICS的患者,并强调侵入性血液动力学监测和快速启动MCS。包含和排除标准模仿“震动”试验中的额外排除标准,在MCS之前使用主动脉泵泵对应脉动。结果共有41名连续41名患者。患者平均年龄为65岁?±14岁,71%是男性,59%的患者入院患者患有心源性休克。在接受MCS之前,93%的患者在血管加压器或肌室上,15%的患者患有医院心脏骤停,27%的患者患有医院心脏骤停,17%的患者在MCS的同时处于活跃的心肺重新刺除正在植入。根据议定书推荐,66%的患者在PCI之前插入了MCS装置。在83%的患者中进行了右心导管插入和血液动力学监测。支持时间的门口平均为83?±58分钟和71%的患者能够在其指数程序的前24小时内降低肌室和血管加压水平。术前心电电输出(CPO)为0.57W,过程后CPO为0.95W,增加67%(P?& 0.001)。对整个队列的外植体的生存率为85%的机构历史对照(85%vs 51%P 1)的显着改善(85%v1%p?<0.001),并存入排出量为76%。结论采用区域休克协议的中心强调侵入性血液动力学监测的早期MCS的交付可以实现快速的支持时间,可以改善患有AMICS的患者的生存。需要更大的国家研究来进一步验证这项试点可行性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号