首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Veterinary Journal: La Revue Veterinaire Canadienne. >Field application of a commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
【24h】

Field application of a commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

机译:商用猪生殖和呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)口服液抗体酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的田间应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used on 31 commercial swine farms in Ontario using oral fluid samples (~6 per herd) collected from cotton ropes. Using the manufacturer's cutoff [sample-to-positive ratio (S/P) ≥ 0.4], 2 of 135 oral fluid samples from 23 PRRSV presumed negative herds tested positive (1.5% false positive rate). Three approaches to improving test diagnostic specificity were compared: i) use a cutoff of S/P ≥ 0.8 for individual oral fluid samples; ii) use the current cutoff of S/P ≥ 0.4 but use a mean S/P based on several oral fluid samples (6 samples were used in this study); and iii) use serial testing to resolve unexpected positive ELISA results, i.e., retest using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to determine whether low positive S/P ratios are the result of early PRRSV infection in a barn.
机译:商业猪生殖和呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)口服液抗体酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)在Ontario的31种商业猪场使用从棉花绳中收集的口服液(每只畜群)。 使用制造商的截止[样品到阳性比(S / P)≥0.4],来自23个PRRSV的135个口服液样品中的2个假定负群测试阳性(1.5%假阳性率)。 比较了提高测试诊断特异性的三种方法:i)使用S /P≥0.8的截止对于个体口腔液样品; ii)使用S /P≥0.4的电流截止,但使用基于几个口服液样品的平均S / P(本研究中使用了6个样品); 和III)使用连续检测来解决意外的阳性ELISA结果,即使用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)重新测试,以确定低阳性S / P比是否是谷仓中早期PRRSV感染的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号