...
首页> 外文期刊>AACE International Transactions >Great Debate 2012: Implementation Considerations Between Enterprise Scheduling Or Stand-Alone Scheduling
【24h】

Great Debate 2012: Implementation Considerations Between Enterprise Scheduling Or Stand-Alone Scheduling

机译:2012年大辩论:企业计划或独立计划之间的实施注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The industry standard is rapidly moving toward use of enterprise scheduling and away from local computer stand-alone scheduling. Stand-alone scheduling has been around for years, and most schedulers are proficient with their software brand, but are they being left behind with the emphasis on enterprise scheduling and web-based schedule software packages? Should scheduling focus on the success of individual projects, or on central reporting and the management of resources across the enterprise? There are benefits and disadvantages to each, but which really is the better choice? This paper will first discuss the benefits of a stand-alone system for project and forensic scheduling. It will then move to the benefits of an enterprise system for project and forensic scheduling. The benefits are solely mentioned with direct intention to assist in identification of the positive aspects of both systems.
机译:行业标准正在迅速朝着使用企业调度的方向发展,而不再是本地计算机的独立调度。单机调度已经存在了很多年,大多数调度器都精通其软件品牌,但是他们是否被重点放在企业调度和基于Web的调度软件包上而落后?计划应该集中于单个项目的成功,还是集中于整个企业的集中报告和资源管理?每种都有优点和缺点,但是哪个更好呢?本文将首先讨论用于项目和司法调度的独立系统的好处。然后它将转移到用于项目和取证调度的企业系统的好处。仅提及这些好处是为了直接识别这两个系统的积极方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号