首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold?Implantation
【24h】

Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold?Implantation

机译:生物可吸收血管支架术后技术对结果的影响吗?植入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Procedural technique may affect clinical outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. Prior studies suggesting such a relationship have not adjusted for baseline patient and lesion characteristics that may have influenced operator choice of technique and outcomes. Objectives This study sought to determine whether target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and scaffold thrombosis (ScT) rates within 3?years of BVS implantation are affected by operator technique (vessel size selection and pre- and post-dilation parameters). Methods TLF and ScT rates were determined in 2,973 patients with 3,149 BVS-treated coronary artery lesions from?5?prospective studies (ABSORB II, ABSORB China, ABSORB Japan, ABSORB III, and ABSORB Extend). Outcomes through 3?years (and between 0 to 1 and 1 to 3 years) were assessed according to pre-specified definitions of optimal technique?(pre-dilation, vessel sizing, and post-dilation). Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for differences in up to?18 patient and lesion characteristics. Results Optimal pre-dilation (balloon to core laboratory-derived reference vessel diameter ratio?≥1:1), vessel size selection (reference vessel diameter?≥2.25?mm and?≤3.75?mm), and post-dilation (with a noncompliant balloon at?≥18?atm and larger than the nominal scaffold diameter, but not by >0.5?mm larger) in all BVS-treated lesions were performed in 59.2%, 81.6%, and 12.4% of patients, respectively. BVS implantation in properly sized vessels was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF through 1 year (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; p?=?0.01) and through 3 years (HR:?0.72; p?=?0.01), and of freedom from ScT through 1 year (HR: 0.36; p?=?0.004). Aggressive pre-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from ScT between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.44; p?=?0.03), and optimal post-dilation was an?independent predictor of freedom from TLF between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.55; p?=?0.05). Conclusions In the present large-scale analysis from the major ABSORB studies, after multivariable adjustment for baseline patient and lesion characteristics, vessel sizing and operator technique were strongly associated with BVS-related outcomes during 3-year follow-up. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II]; NCT01425281 ; ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906 ; A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population—ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB CHINA]; NCT01923740 ; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789 ; AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284 ) Central Illustration Display Omitted
机译:摘要背景程序技术可能会影响生物吸收血管支架(BVS)植入后的临床结果。提出的研究表明这种关系没有针对基线患者和病变特征调整,这些特征可能影响了操作者的技术和结果。目的本研究寻求判断目标病变失败(TLF)(TLF)(心脏死亡,靶血管心肌梗死或缺血驱动的目标病变血型血管或3多年的BVS植入中的血管血栓形成(SCT)率是否受到操作员技术的影响(血管尺寸选择和预扩张和后期参数)。方法采用2,973例BVS治疗的冠状动脉病变的2,973名患者中测定TLF和SCT率,从?5〜前瞻性研究(吸收II,吸收中国,吸收日本,吸收III和吸收延伸)。根据最佳技术预先定义评估了3年(和0到1至3岁之间的结果?(预扩张,血管尺寸和扩张后)。使用多变量分析来调整差异的差异,患者和病变特征。结果最佳预扩张(球囊到核心实验室衍生的参考容器直径比Δ≥1:1),容器尺寸选择(参考容器直径θ≥2.25?mm,≤3.75Ωmm)和扩张后(带在所有BVS处理的病变中分别以59.2%,81.6%和12.4%的患者分别在所有BVS处理病变中进行不合规且不高于标称支架直径,但不是>0.5Ωmm更大的球囊。适当大小的船只的BVS植入是从TLF到1年(危害比[HR]:0.67; P?= 0.01)和3年(HR:0.72; P?=?0.01)的自由预测因子从SCT到1年的自由(HR:0.36; P?= 0.004)。侵略性的预扩张是从1到3年的SCT自由的独立预测因子(HR:0.44; p?= 0.03),并且最佳扩张后患者是一个?与TLF自由的独立预测因子在1到3年间(HR :0.55; p?= 0.05)。结论在主要的吸收研究中的目前大规模分析,在基线患者和病变特征的多变量调节后,血管施胶和操作员技术在3年的随访期间与BVS相关的结果强烈相关。 (吸收II随机对照试验[吸收II]; NCT01425281;吸收III随机对照试验[RCT] [Abshe-III]; NCT01751906;中国人群吸收生物吸收血管支架[吸收BVS]系统的临床评价 - Abstal China Arcomination Concepton试验[RCT] [吸收中国]; NCT01923740;吸收延伸临床调查[吸收延伸]; NCT01023789; AVJ-301临床试验:AVJ-301 [吸收BVS]的临床评价[吸收日本]; NCT01844284)中央省略插图显示

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号