...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on depression and health-related quality of life in type 2diabetes: The lookahead trial
【24h】

Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on depression and health-related quality of life in type 2diabetes: The lookahead trial

机译:强化生活方式干预对2年二十八型抑郁症和健康相关生活质量的影响:寻求试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE We examined the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI), compared with a diabetes support and education (DSE) control intervention, on long-term changes in depression symptoms, antidepressant medication (ADM) use, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Look AHEAD was a multisite randomized controlled trial of 5,145 overweight/ obese participants assigned to ILI (designed to produce weight loss) or DSE and followed for a median of 9.6 years. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was administered at baseline, annually at years 1-4, and again at year 8. Mean BDI scores and incidence of BDI scores ≥10, indicative of likely mild or greater depression, were examined. Annually through year 10, participants reported their ADM use and completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which yields physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. RESULTS ILI significantly reduced the incidence of mild or greater depression symptoms (BDI scores ≥10) compared with DSE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.97; P = 0.0145). Although SF-36 PCS scores worsened over time in both groups, ILI participants reported better physical function than DSE throughout the first 8 years (all P <0.01). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in the proportion of participants who used ADMs or in SF-36 MCS scores. CONCLUSIONS ILI for overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes may reduce the risk of developing clinically significant symptoms of depression and preserve physical HRQoL. These findings should be considered when evaluating the potential benefits of ILIs.
机译:目的,我们研究了密集的生活方式干预(ILI)的影响,与糖尿病支持和教育(DSE)控制干预相比,抑郁症状的长期变化,抗抑郁药物(ADM)使用以及与健康有关的生活质量(HRQOL)超重/肥胖的患有2型糖尿病的个体。研究设计和方法展望未来是5,145分配给ILI的5,145个超重/肥胖参与者的多路随机对照试验(旨在产生体重减轻)或DSE,并遵循9.6岁的中位数。将Beck抑郁库存(BDI)在基线上,每年在1-4年,同时在8年级。平均BDI评分和BDI评分的发病率≥10,指示可能是温和或更大的抑郁症。每年通过10年级,参与者报告其ADM使用并完成了医疗成果研究短表36(SF-36)调查问卷,其产生了物理组件摘要(PC)和心理组件摘要(MCS)分数。结果ILI与DSE(危险比[HR] = 0.85; 95%CI 0.75-0.97; P = 0.0145),Ili显着降低了轻度或更高抑郁症状的发病率(BDI评分≥10); P = 0.0145)。虽然SF-36 PCS分数随着时间的推移而恶化,但在前8年(所有P <0.01)中,ILI参与者报告的物理功能比DSE更好。在使用ADMS或SF-36 MCS分数的参与者比例中,治疗臂之间没有显着差异。结论ILI对2型糖尿病患者的超重/肥胖患者可能会降低患有临床显着抑郁症状和保护物理HRQOL的风险。在评估ILIS的潜在益处时,应考虑这些调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号