...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis
【24h】

Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis

机译:主动脉瓣膜置换后升高的主动脉瘤的长期预后与三尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The bicuspid aorta is thought to have a higher risk of progressive dilation after aortic valve replacement with a subsequently increased risk of adverse aortic events. Our aim was to compare the risk of late aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant mild to moderate dilatation of the proximal aorta. Methods: A total of 325 consecutive patients (60% males; mean age, 59.5 ?10 years) with aortic valve stenosis and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation of 40 to 50 mm underwent isolated aortic valve replacement from 1995 through 2000. A total of 153 patients (47%) were diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (bicuspid aortic valve group), whereas the remaining 172 patients (53%) had tricuspid aortic valve stenosis (tricuspid aortic valve group). Follow-up (3566 patient-years) was 100% complete. Adverse aortic events were defined as the need for proximal aortic surgery or the occurrence of aortic dissection/rupture or sudden death during follow-up. Results: Overall survival was 78 ?4% in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 55 ?6% in the tricuspid aortic valve group (P =.006) at 15 years postoperatively, but age-adjusted survival was not significantly different between groups (P =.4). A total of 5 patients (3%) in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 9 patients (5%) in the tricuspid aortic valve group underwent proximal aortic surgery during follow-up. Aortic dissection occurred in 3 patients in the tricuspid aortic valve group and in no bicuspid aortic valve patients. Fifteen-year freedom from adverse aortic events was 93 ?3% in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 82 ?6% in the tricuspid aortic valve group (P =.2). Conclusions: Patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant mild to moderate ascending aortic dilatation are at comparably low risk of adverse aortic events 15 years after isolated aortic valve replacement.
机译:目的:Bicuspid主动脉被认为在主动脉瓣膜置换后具有更高的进步扩张风险,随后增加了不良主动脉事件的风险。我们的目的是比较孤立主动脉瓣膜置换术治疗双囊瓣膜置换手术的患者的风险,与三尖症主动脉瓣狭窄,伴随着轻度至中等扩张的近端主动脉。方法:连续325名患者(60%的男性;平均年龄,59.5〜10年),主动脉瓣狭窄和伴随着1995年至2000年的孤立主动脉瓣置换的40至50毫米的主动脉膨胀。共有153名患者(47%)被诊断为双裂主动脉瓣狭窄(双囊主动脉瓣组),而剩余的172名患者(53%)具有三尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄(Tricuspid主动脉瓣组)。随访(3566患者 - 年)填写100%。不良主动脉事件被定义为需要近端主动脉手术或在随访期间发生主动脉夹层/破裂或猝死的发生。结果:在术后15年的三尖症主动脉瓣膜组(P = 0.006)中,双瓣主动脉瓣膜组的总存活率为78〜4%,但术后年龄调节的存活率在组之间没有显着差异(P = .4)。在三丘脑主动脉瓣组中,共有5名患者(3%)在三尖症主动脉瓣组中进行的9例(5%)在随访期间接受了近端主动脉术治疗。三尖瓣主动脉瓣组中的3例患者发生主动脉夹层,在没有双裂主动脉瓣膜患者中。来自逆主动脉事件的十五年度自由于三尖瓣主动脉瓣膜组(P = .2)中的双囊主动脉瓣膜组93.3%。结论:伴随着伴随温和至中度上升主动脉扩张的双裂和三尖症主动脉瓣狭窄的患者处于孤立主动脉瓣膜置换后15年的不良主动脉事件的风险相对低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号