首页> 外文期刊>Urology >The State of Prescreening Discussions About Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Following Implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force Statement
【24h】

The State of Prescreening Discussions About Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Following Implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force Statement

机译:在2012年实施2012年美国预防服务工作队陈述后,关于前列腺特异性抗原测试的讨论的状态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To determine if the quality of prescreening discussions has changed following release of the United States Preventive Services Task Force statement against prostate cancer screening. Methods This cross-sectional study used the 2012 and 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. Respondents were categorized based on the year in which they responded to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey. Quality of prescreening discussion was operationalized as having discussed only advantages, only disadvantages, both advantages and disadvantages, or neither. Race/ethnicity, education level, income, insurance status, and having a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level actually drawn after prescreening counseling served as confounders in our multivariate analysis. Results Among 217,053 men in the analytic sample, 37% were told about only advantages of PSA screening compared to 30% of men who were advised about both advantages and disadvantages. Men who were told about neither advantages nor disadvantages were more likely to be Hispanic, not graduate high school, have low income, and not have insurance. Controlling for covariates, men in 2014 were significantly more likely to have undergone PSA testing without having discussed either advantages or disadvantages than men in 2012. Conclusion Comprehensive prescreening discussions about advantages and disadvantages of PSA testing are critical to informed decision making about prostate cancer screening. Disparities not only exist with regard to the quality of prescreening discussions that patients receive from their providers prior to PSA testing across categories of race/ethnicity, education, income, and insurance status, but these disparities became more substantial between 2012 and 2014. Further investigation is warranted to elicit more specific reasons behind these variations.
机译:目的确定,随着前列腺癌筛查的释放,在美国预防性服务的特遣部队陈述释放后,预先审议讨论的质量是否发生了变化。方法采用2012和2014年行为风险因素监测系统调查。受访者根据他们回应行为风险因素监测系统调查的年份进行分类。预筛选讨论的质量被运作,因为只讨论了优势,只有缺点,既不是的,也不是缺点。在计划咨询后,实际上绘制了种族/种族,教育水平,收入,保险状况,并具有前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平担任我们多变量分析中的混乱。结果分析样本中217,053名男性中,37%被告知PSA筛查的优势与30%的男性,他们建议两者的优缺点。被告知的男人既没有优势,弊端也更有可能是西班牙裔,而不是毕业高中,收入低,没有保险。控制协变量,2014年的男性在2012年的情况下,2014年的男性在未经讨论的优点或缺点的情况下大得多。结论关于PSA测试的优缺点的综合计划讨论对于通知前列腺癌筛查是至关重要的。不仅存在关于预定讨论的质量的差异,患者在跨越种族/种族,教育,收入和保险状况的PSA测试之前从他们的提供者接受,但2012年和2014年之间的这些差异变得更加重要。进一步调查有必要引出这些变化背后的更具体的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号