首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Surgeon-delivered laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks are non-inferior to anesthesia-delivered ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks: a blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial
【24h】

Surgeon-delivered laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks are non-inferior to anesthesia-delivered ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks: a blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial

机译:外科医生交付的腹腔镜横梁腹部平面块是非劣质麻醉 - 交付的超声引导的横向架腹部斜面块:一个盲化的随机的非劣升性试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an important non-narcotic adjunct for post-operative pain control in abdominal surgery. Surgeons can use laparoscopic guidance for TAP block placement (LTAP), however, direct comparisons to conventional ultrasound-guided TAP (UTAPs) have been lacking. The aim of this study is to determine if surgeon placed LTAPs were non-inferior to anesthesia placed UTAPs for post-operative pain control in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, patient and observer blinded parallel-arm non-inferiority trial conducted at a single tertiary academic center between 2016 and 2018 on adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Narcotic consumption and pain scores were compared for LTAP vs. UTAP for 48 h post-operatively. Results 60 patients completed the trial (31 UTAP, 29 LTAP) of which 25 patients were female (15 UTAP, 10 LTAP) and the mean ages (SD) were 60.0 (13.6) and 61.5 (14.3) in the UTAP and LTAP groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in post-operative narcotic consumption between UTAP and LTAP at the time of PACU discharge (median [IQR] milligrams of morphine, 1.8 [0-4.5] UTAP vs. 0 [0-8.7] LTAPP = .32), 6 h post-operatively (5.4 [1.8-17.1] UTAP vs. 3.6 [0-12.6] LTAPP = .28), at 12 h post-operatively (9.0 [3.6-29.4] UTAP vs. 7.2 [0.9-22.5] LTAPP = .51), at 24 h post-operatively (9.0 [3.6-29.4] UTAP vs. 7.2 [0.9-22.5] LTAPP = .63), and 48 h post-operatively (39.9 [7.5-70.2] UTAP vs. 22.2 [7.5-63.8] LTAP P = .41). Patient-reported pain scores as well as pre-, intra-, and post-operative course were similar between groups. Non-inferiority criteria were met at all post-op time points up to and including 24 h but not at 48 h. Conclusions Surgeon-delivered LTAPs are safe, effective, and non-inferior to anesthesia-administered UTAPs in the immediate post-operative period. Trial registry The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03577912.
机译:背景技术横向腹部平面(TAP)块是腹部手术后术后疼痛控制的重要非麻醉剂辅助。外科医生可以使用腹腔镜引导来进行块块放置(LTAP),然而,缺乏传统超声波引导龙头(UTAP)的直接比较。本研究的目的是确定外科医生是否对麻醉的非较差,放置了腹腔镜结肠直肠手术中的术后疼痛控制。方法这是在2016年至2018年间在腹腔镜结直肠手术的成年患者之间进行的一项在一家三级学术中心进行的预期,随机的,患者和观察者盲目的平行武器非卑鄙的非劣级试验。比较麻醉消耗和疼痛评分,可操作地进行LTAP与UTAP 48小时。结果60例患者完成了utAP和LTAP组的25名患者的试验(31 utAP,29个LTAP),其中25名患者是雌性(15 utAP,10个)和平均年龄(13.6)和61.5(14.3)分别。在PACU放电时UTAP和LTAP之间的术后麻醉消耗量没有显着差异(METHIAN [IQR] milphams的吗啡,1.8 [0-4.5] UTAP与0 [0-8.7] LTAPAP = .32) ,6小时可操作地(5.4 [1.8-17.1] UTAP与3.6 [0-12.6] LTAPP = .28),可操作地12小时(9.0 [3.6-29.4] UTAP与7.2 [0.9-22.5] LTAPAP = .51),操作后24小时(9.0 [3.6-29.4] UTAP与7.2 [0.9-22.5] LTAPP = .63),可操作后48小时(39.9 [7.5-70.2] UTAP与22.2 [7.5-63.8] LTAP p = .41)。患者报告的疼痛评分以及术语中的患者和后期和后期疗程之间相似。在所有折扣时间内都会满足非劣等标准,直到和包括24小时但不在48小时。结论外科医生交付LTAP是安全,有效的,并且在术后时期的麻醉助手中是安全的,有效的,有效的。试验登记处试验在ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT03577912上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号