首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Polymer Science >Comparison of the failure conditions for creep, stress relaxation, and constant strain rate measurements to predict pipe burst for two ABS materials using the universal viscoelastic model
【24h】

Comparison of the failure conditions for creep, stress relaxation, and constant strain rate measurements to predict pipe burst for two ABS materials using the universal viscoelastic model

机译:使用通用粘弹性模型比较蠕变,应力松弛和恒定应变率测量的失效条件,以预测两种ABS材料的管道破裂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The universal viscoelastic model was further validated in this study using two acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) viscoelastic materials to better elucidate the direct relationship between the failure criterion characteristics involving creep, constant strain rate, stress relaxation, and pipe burst. Using the yield strain as the failure criterion for constant strain rate and stress relaxation measurements and the strain at critical creep, the failure condition for creep, it was found that the universal viscoelastic model allowed these failure criteria to yield remarkably good agreement on a projected time scale. The relationship of the failure criteria between these three different techniques for characterizing a viscoelastic material was successfully used to identify several complementary approaches to predict long-term pipe burst for two different ABS materials. The pipe burst data for ABS-A appeared to fit the Tresca failure criterion better than the von Mises failure criterion, as predicted from failure criteria using constant strain rate, creep, and stress relaxation measurements. For ABS-A the extrapolated creep and the constant strain rate failure criterion appeared to best predict the Tresca failure criterion pipe burst data. However, the hoop burst stress for ABS-N, adjusted with the von Mises failure criterion modification, was found to give the best agreement with the yield stress equivalent failure criterion for constant strain rate, creep, and stress relaxation. For ABS-N, the extrapolated creep failure criteria appeared to best predict the von Mises pipe burst failure criterion. In this study, the relationships between the failure criteria for the three different experimental techniques of constant strain rate, creep, and stress relaxation were shown to be reasonably interchangeable relative to a three-dimensional failure configuration such as pipe burst. Because this interchangeability approach was found to work so well in the laboratory, there is no reason to believe that this same technique, using the universal viscoelastic model, would not also work as well to predict failure criteria for design applications using finite-element analysis. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:在本研究中,使用两种丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)粘弹性材料进一步验证了通用粘弹性模型,以更好地阐明蠕变,恒定应变率,应力松弛和管破裂的破坏准则特征之间的直接关系。使用屈服应变作为恒定应变率和应力松弛测量的破坏准则,以及临界蠕变下的应变(蠕变的破坏条件),发现通用粘弹性模型使这些破坏准则可以在预计的时间内产生显着良好的一致性规模。这三种表征粘弹性材料的不同技术之间的失效标准之间的关系已成功用于识别几种互补方法,以预测两种不同ABS材料的长期管道破裂。 ABS-A的爆管数据似乎比Tresca破坏准则更适合于Tresca破坏准则,这是使用恒定应变率,蠕变和应力松弛测量值从破坏准则所预测的。对于ABS-A,外推蠕变和恒定应变率破坏准则似乎可以最好地预测Tresca破坏准则的管道爆破数据。但是,发现通过von Mises破坏准则修改进行调整的ABS-N的环向破裂应力与恒定应变速率,蠕变和应力松弛的屈服应力等效破坏准则给出了最佳一致性。对于ABS-N,外推蠕变破坏准则似乎可以最好地预测von Mises管道爆裂破坏准则。在这项研究中,相对于三维破裂结构(例如管爆裂),恒定应变速率,蠕变和应力松弛这三种不同实验技术的破裂标准之间的关系显示出合理的互换性。由于发现这种可互换性方法在实验室中效果很好,因此没有理由相信使用通用粘弹性模型的同一技术也无法很好地预测使用有限元分析的设计应用的失效标准。 (C)2004年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号