【24h】

The Bolam test

机译:博拉姆测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I disagree with Cathal Gallagher regarding the consequences of the General Pharmaceutical Council not providing guidance on the law (PJ, 10 November 2012, p524).There is an ancient concept that ignorance of the law does not provide a defence and is often referred to in the context of the criminal law. The principle applies just as much to a pharmacist as to anyone else. What Dr Gallgher refers to as the Bolitho test is actually the Bolam test, from the case of Bolam vs Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582. The case of Bolitho vs City and Hackney Health Authority (1998) AC 232 is an exception to the Bolam test, when a particular practice cannot be defended on a logical basis. In the main the Bolam test applies to civil law such as negligence and would not provide a defence to a charge (criminal or professional regulatory) of erroneously supplying a Controlled Drug.
机译:我对Cathal Gallagher的看法不赞成,因为通用制药委员会未就法律提供指导(PJ,2012年11月10日,第524页)。有一个古老的概念,即对法律的无知并不能提供辩护,而在法律中经常提到刑法的背景。该原则对药剂师和其他任何人同样适用。 Gallgher博士所说的Bolitho检验实际上是Bolam检验,来自Bolam vs Friern医院管理委员会(1957)1 WLR 582的案例。Bolitho vs City and Hackney Health Authority(1998)AC 232是一个例外如果无法在逻辑上捍卫某种特定实践,则可以通过Bolam测试。基本上,Bolam检验适用于诸如过失之类的民法,并且不会为错误供应受控药物的指控(犯罪或专业法规)提供辩护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号