首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >No place in modern practice
【24h】

No place in modern practice

机译:现代实践中没有地方

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I write with reference to Chris Toothill's letter (PJ,28 January,p105) and the article on the stability of compliance aids (PJ,21 January,p75).The issues raised have only confirmed my beliefs that our keenness to supply monitored dosage systems to patients has no place in modern practice.Quite often we are asked to supply MDS to cover up shortfalls in care from the social services.What is the answer?Is it to have the appropriate agencies take on the responsibilities rather than pharmacy?With the double edged sword of clinical governance and professional liability never far away I would be interested to hear the views of the National Pharmacy Association,Pharmacy Mutual Insurance,the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society on what is effectively the use of products outside their product licences.
机译:我是参考Chris Toothill的信(PJ,1月28日,p105)和有关顺应性辅助剂稳定性的文章(PJ,1月21日,p75)撰写的。所提出的问题仅证实了我的信念,即我们渴望提供受监控的剂量系统对患者而言,在现代实践中没有任何地位。通常我们被要求提供MDS来弥补社会服务方面的医疗不足。答案是什么?是由适当的机构来承担责任而不是药学吗?临床治理和专业责任的双刃剑永远不会消失我想听听美国国家药学协会,药学互助保险,药学服务谈判委员会和皇家药学会关于有效使用其产品以外的产品的观点产品许可证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号