...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Algorithm-based management of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in patients after pelvic radiation treatment (ORBIT): A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Algorithm-based management of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in patients after pelvic radiation treatment (ORBIT): A randomised controlled trial

机译:基于算法的盆腔放射治疗(ORBIT)后患者胃肠道症状的管理:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Chronic gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy are common, multifactorial in cause, and affect patients' quality of life. We assessed whether such patients could be helped if a practitioner followed an investigative and management algorithm, and whether outcomes differed by whether a nurse or a gastroenterologist led this algorithm-based care. Methods For this three-arm randomised controlled trial we recruited patients (aged ≥18 years) from clinics in London, UK, with new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms persisting 6 months after pelvic radiotherapy. Using a computergenerated random isation sequence, we randomly allocated patients to one of three groups (1:1:1; stratified by tumour site [urological, gynaecological, or gastrointestinal], and degree of bowel dysfunction [IBDQ-B score <60 vs 60-70]): usual care (a detailed self-help booklet), gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment, or nurse-led algorithm-based treatment. The primary endpoint was change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel subset score (IBDQ-B) at 6 months, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00737230. Findings Between Nov 26, 2007, and Dec 12, 2011, we enrolled and randomly allocated 218 patients to treatment: 80 to the nurse group, 70 to the gastroenterologist group, and 68 to the booklet group (figure). Most had a baseline IBDQ-B score indicating moderate-to-severe symptoms. We recorded the following pair-wise mean difference in change in IBDQ-B score between groups: nurse versus booklet 4·12 (95% CI 0·04-8·19; p=0·04), gastroenterologist versus booklet 5·47 (1·14-9·81; p=0·01). Outcomes in the nurse group were not inferior to outcomes in the gastroenterologist group (mean difference 1·36, one sided 95% CI -1·48). Interpretation Patients given targeted intervention following a detailed clinical algorithm had better improvements in radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal symptoms than did patients given usual care. Our findings suggest that, for most patients, this algorithm-based care can be given by a trained nurse.
机译:背景盆腔放疗后的慢性胃肠道症状很常见,病因多种多样,并影响患者的生活质量。我们评估了如果从业人员遵循调查和管理算法是否可以为这类患者提供帮助,以及护士或胃肠病医生是否主导了这种基于算法的护理,结果是否有所不同。方法在这项三臂随机对照试验中,我们从英国伦敦的诊所招募了年龄≥18岁的患者,这些患者在盆腔放疗后持续6个月仍出现新的胃肠道症状。使用计算机生成的随机序列,我们将患者随机分为三组(1:1:1;按肿瘤部位[泌尿科,妇科或胃肠道]和肠功能障碍的程度[IBDQ-B得分<60 vs 60)分层-70]):常规护理(详细的自助手册),胃肠病医生主导的基于算法的治疗或护士主导的基于算法的治疗。主要终点是6个月时炎症性肠疾病问卷-Bowel亚组评分(IBDQ-B)的变化,并通过治疗意向进行了分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT00737230。研究结果从2007年11月26日至2011年12月12日,我们招募并随机分配了218例患者进行治疗:护士组80例,胃肠病学家组70例,手册组68例(图)。大多数患者的基线IBDQ-B评分表明中度至重度症状。我们记录了以下两组IBDQ-B评分变化的成对平均差异:护士与手册4·12(95%CI 0·04-8·19; p = 0·04),肠胃科医生与手册5·47 (1·14-9·81; p = 0·01)。护士组的结果并不逊于胃肠病学组的结果(平均差异1·36,单侧95%CI -1·48)。解释接受详细临床算法靶向治疗的患者比接受常规护理的患者在放疗引起的胃肠道症状方面有更好的改善。我们的发现表明,对于大多数患者而言,可以由训练有素的护士提供这种基于算法的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号