首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence.
【24h】

Injectable extended-release naltrexone for opioid dependence.

机译:阿片类药物依赖的注射型缓释纳曲酮。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Daniel Wolfe and colleagues (April 30, p I468) present a very unbalanced review of published data in an apparent effortto showthat injectable extended-release naltrexone is more dangerous than agonist treatment for a disorder with a known high mortality. For example, they misrepresent the fact that all deaths in the Miotto study occurred after patients stopped oral naltrexone (a problem sustained-release formulations address); ignored missing data in the Digiustostudy that reported excess deaths after naltrexone versus methadone treatment even though 33% of naltrexone patients and 88% of agonist patients had no out-of-treatment observation time; and overlooked that Gibson and Degenhardt compared deaths after naltrexone versus methadone during the first 2 weeks of methadone and did not mention that deaths also increase after patients leave methadone maintenance.
机译:丹尼尔·沃尔夫(Daniel Wolfe)及其同事(4月30日,第I468页)提出了对公开数据的非常不平衡的审查,显然是为了表明对于已知高死亡率的疾病,注射性缓释纳曲酮比激动剂治疗更危险。例如,他们歪曲了Miotto研究中所有死亡都发生在患者停止口服纳曲酮后的事实(缓释制剂解决了这一问题)。忽略了Digiustostudy中丢失的数据,该数据报告了纳曲酮和美沙酮治疗后死亡过多,即使33%的纳曲酮患者和88%的激动剂患者没有治疗前的观察时间;并忽略了Gibson和Degenhardt比较了在美沙酮治疗的头2周内纳曲酮与美沙酮治疗后的死亡,并且没有提到在患者离开美沙酮维持治疗后死亡也增加了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Lancet》 |2011年第9792期|共3页
  • 作者

    Woody GE; Metzger DS;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号