【24h】

Editorial comment

机译:编辑评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Editorial Comment: The key words in the title of this article are "critical" and "systematic." Only patients with nonneurogenic and stress urinary incontinence undergoing primary bulbar implant of a single cuff and a 61 to 77 cm water pressure regulating balloon AMS 800? device by a surgical approach combining perineal and abdominal incisions were included. The authors report that "as a whole, the level of evidence supporting the use of [artificial urinary sphincter] for non-neurogenic [stress urinary incontinence] was low. Most of the reports were subject to methodological bias and failed to report the results accurately." Dry or improved rates were computed as 79%, apparently including all patients with 1 pad or less, and the range was from 61% to 100%. Dry rates varied from 4.3% to 85.7%. The authors state that the lack of a uniform definition of cure and the reliable use of more objective tools such as standardized pad testing prevent the true estimation of cure rate. The mean rate of erosion and infection was 8.5%, varying from 3.3% to 27.8%. In those series where urethral atrophy was "adequately reported" the mean percentage occurrence was 7.9%, varying from 1.9% to 28.6%. Mechanical failure rates varied between 2% and 13.8%, and the mean reintervention rate was 26%, varying from 14.8% to 44.8%. The review included 12 reports, comprising 623 patients with a minimum followup of 2 years. The results will be viewed as half full by some, half empty by others. For a more complete assessment of this device, and of others, the authors propose prospective studies; improved patient selection with stratification of symptoms and etiologies; contemporary definitions of "success" and appropriate methodology for measurement; utilization of only validated tools for symptoms, subjective cure, satisfaction and quality of life; prespecified definitions for early and late complications; followup beyond 5 years but in no case less than 1 year, and handling of absent data due to dropouts (utilization of intention to treat principles).
机译:社论评论:本文标题中的关键词是“关键的”和“系统的”。仅患有非神经源性和压力性尿失禁的患者接受单个袖套和61至77厘米水压调节气球AMS 800的初生球根植入术吗?通过手术方法结合会阴和腹部切口的装置。作者报告说:“总体上,支持将[人工尿道括约肌]用于非神经源性[压力性尿失禁]的证据水平很低。大多数报告都受到方法学偏见的影响,未能准确报告结果。”干燥率或改善率计算为79%,显然包括所有垫数不超过1的患者,范围为61%至100%。干燥率从4.3%到85.7%不等。作者指出,缺乏统一的固化定义以及可靠地使用更客观的工具(例如标准垫测试)无法正确估算固化率。侵蚀和感染的平均比率为8.5%,从3.3%到27.8%不等。在“充分报道”了尿道萎缩的那些系列中,平均发生百分比为7.9%,从1.9%到28.6%不等。机械故障率在2%至13.8%之间,平均再干预率为26%,从14.8%至44.8%不等。审查包括12份报告,包括623名患者,至少随访2年。结果将被某些人视为一半已满,而其他人则视为一半为空。为了对该设备以及其他设备进行更完整的评估,作者提出了前瞻性研究。通过对症状和病因进行分层来改善患者选择;当代的“成功”定义和适当的测量方法;仅使用经过验证的工具进行症状,主观治愈,满意度和生活质量的使用;预先定义的早期和晚期并发症的定义;随访超过5年,但绝不少于1年,并处理因辍学而导致的缺失数据(利用治疗原则的意图)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Urology》 |2014年第6期|共1页
  • 作者

    WeinA.J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 15:17:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号