首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >In planta suppressiveness to nematodes and long term root health stability through biological enhancement - do we need a cocktail?
【24h】

In planta suppressiveness to nematodes and long term root health stability through biological enhancement - do we need a cocktail?

机译:通过生物增强来抑制线虫对植物的危害以及长期保持根部健康-我们需要鸡尾酒吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is taken for granted that plants grow in a very complex soil environment harboring diverse microorganisms and are constantly exposed to numerous complex biological interactions that either positively or negatively affect root health and growth. Some scientists believe the soil environment is not complex, and that biological interactions are rare and seldom affect plant growth significantly. Plant pathologists frequently adhere to the low complexity school of thought and therefore often target their research work to a single pest/disease interaction. Similarly biologists studying microbial-based biological control also tend to study one antagonist and one pest, a concept that has been reasonably successful, for example, in biological enhancement of banana planting material with endophytic microorganisms. Good control has been attained regardless of the antagonist involved: mutualistic endophytic fungi or bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant health-promoting rhizobacteria or entomopathogenic fungi. There are many practical reasons for a single antagonist approach, but in planta suppressiveness in the field is not an industrial-based phenomenon but is based on unique interrelationships between the microbial community and plants, which result in a healthy root system. Success has been achieved with biological enhancement of plant material for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes in Musa. Practical application is no longer a question of if, but a question of when and where. However, a number of questions still confront those working with the biological enhancement concept: (1) can we increase the levels of control presently attained? (2) can we extend the spectrum of target pests affected? and (3) can in planta suppressiveness be established for long term control? Since in planta suppressiveness is clearly related to the activity of microbial communities and not to a single organism, the question that requires answering is - do we need a cocktail?
机译:理所当然的是,植物在具有多种微生物的非常复杂的土壤环境中生长,并不断暴露于对根系健康和生长产生积极或消极影响的众多复杂生物相互作用。一些科学家认为土壤环境并不复杂,生物相互作用很少见,很少影响植物的生长。植物病理学家经常遵循低复杂性的思想流派,因此经常将其研究工作针对单一的病虫害/疾病相互作用。类似地,研究基于微生物的生物防治的生物学家也倾向于研究一种拮抗剂和一种有害生物,这一概念已相当成功,例如,利用内生微生物对香蕉种植材料进行了生物增强。无论涉及哪种拮抗剂,都已达到良好的控制:互生的内生真菌或细菌,丛枝菌根真菌,促进植物健康的根际细菌或致病性真菌。单一拮抗剂方法有许多实际原因,但是在植物中,抑制植物界不是基于工业的现象,而是基于微生物群落与植物之间独特的相互关系,从而形成了健康的根系。通过生物增强植物材料来管理 Musa 中的植物寄生线虫,已取得成功。实际应用不再是是否存在的问题,而是何时何地的问题。但是,使用生物增强概念的人们仍然面临许多问题:(1)我们能否提高目前达到的控制水平? (2)我们可以扩大受影响目标害虫的范围吗? (3)是否可以建立长期抑制植物的抑制作用?由于植物中的抑制作用显然与微生物群落的活动有关,而不与单个生物有关,因此需要回答的问题是-我们需要鸡尾酒吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号