首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis >Comparison of disturbed and undisturbed soil core methods to estimate nitrogen-mineralization rates in manured agricultural soils.
【24h】

Comparison of disturbed and undisturbed soil core methods to estimate nitrogen-mineralization rates in manured agricultural soils.

机译:比较受干扰和不受干扰的土壤核心方法,以估算施肥的农业土壤中的氮矿化率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ion exchange resin/soil cores are a common in situ approach to estimating soil nitrogen (N) mineralization rates. However, no studies compare the two common methods of core preparation (disturbed and undisturbed). The objective of our study was to compare N mineralized and soil temperature in disturbed versus undisturbed cores of manured agricultural soils. Undisturbed cores were prepared by driving aluminum tubes (25 cm long with 10 cm inner diameter) into soil, removing the tubes, and then inserting an ion-exchange resin bag beneath the soil at the bottom of the tube. Disturbed cores were prepared with the same materials, but soil was excavated, mixed, and then filled into tubes fitted with ion-exchange resin bags at the bottom. Soil from six agricultural fields (five of which had more than 10 years of regular dairy manure application) was incubated over four time periods during summer and winter. A total of 13 soil/incubation-period combinations were tested. Disturbed cores tended to have more N mineralized than undisturbed cores (P<0.10), especially in cores prepared with the lowest clay content soil. However, variability of N mineralized was lower in disturbed cores than undisturbed cores for 11 of the 13 soil/incubation periods. This lower variability was significant in two of the four incubation periods (P<0.10). There was little difference in mean soil temperatures in disturbed versus undisturbed cores or within cores versus outside but adjacent to cores. However, in summer, the daily temperature range inside cores was significantly greater than the temperature range in soil outside cores (P<0.01).
机译:离子交换树脂/土壤核是估计土壤氮(N)矿化速率的常用原位方法。但是,尚无研究比较两种常用的岩心制备方法(扰动和未扰动)。我们研究的目的是比较施肥的农业土壤中受干扰和不受干扰的岩心中的氮矿化度和土壤温度。通过将铝管(长25厘米,内径10厘米)推入土壤中,取出铝管,然后将离子交换树脂袋插入管底部土壤下方,制备未受干扰的岩心。用相同的材​​料制备扰动的岩心,但要挖出土壤,混合,然后装入底部装有离子交换树脂袋的管中。在夏季和冬季,在六个时间段内对六个农业领域(其中五个有超过10年的常规奶牛粪肥施用)的土壤进行了温育。总共测试了13个土壤/温育期组合。扰动的岩心往往比未扰动的岩心具有更多的矿化氮(P <0.10),尤其是在粘土含量最低的土壤中。然而,在13个土壤/潜伏期中的11个,受干扰岩心中矿化N的变异性低于未受干扰岩心。在四个潜伏期中的两个潜伏期中,这种较低的变异性很显着(P <0.10)。扰动和未受扰动的岩心或岩心内部与外部但邻近岩心的平均土壤温度差异不大。然而,在夏季,岩心内部的日温度范围明显大于岩心外部的土壤温度范围(P <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号