首页> 外文期刊>癌と化学療法 >Bone marrow suppression--including guidelines for the appropriate use of G-CSF
【24h】

Bone marrow suppression--including guidelines for the appropriate use of G-CSF

机译:骨髓抑制-包括适当使用G-CSF的指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

For previously untreated patients receiving most chemotherapy regimens, primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) cannot be recommended. Secondary prophylactic G-CSF administration can lessen incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy in patients with a prior episode of FN. Physicians should consider chemotherapy dose reduction after neutropenic fever or severe or prolonged neutropenia after the previous cycle of treatment. Intervention with G-CSF in afebrile neutropenic patients is not recommended. For the majority of patients with FN, the available data do not clearly support the routine initiation of G-CSF as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy. However, certain FN patients may have prognostic factors that are predictive of clinical deterioration, such as pneumonia, hypotension, multiorgan dysfunction (sepsis syndrome), or fungal infection. The therapeutic use of G-CSF together with antibiotics may be reasonable in such high-risk patients. Empirical antifungal therapy is effective, especially for patients with neutropenia who were treated for seven days with empirical antibiotic therapy but remained febrile, or became afebrile but then had recurrent fever. The patient's overall clinical status and laboratory parameters are both considered when deciding to transfuse a patient. Epoetin may be available for use in the future as a treatment option for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dl. Giving prophylactic platelets at a threshold of 10,000/microliter compared with 20,000/microliter can decrease the total utilization of platelets with only a small adverse effect on bleeding, and no statistically significant effect on morbidity.
机译:对于以前接受过大多数化学疗法治疗的患者,不建议对粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行预防性给药。在有FN发作的患者中,二次预防性G-CSF给药可以减少随后的化疗周期中发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的发生。医师应考虑在中性粒细胞减少症后或先前治疗周期后严重或长期中性粒细胞减少症后降低化疗剂量。不建议对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者进行G-CSF干预。对于大多数FN患者,可用数据并不明显支持G-CSF常规开始作为抗生素治疗的辅助手段。但是,某些FN患者可能具有可预示临床恶化的预后因素,例如肺炎,低血压,多器官功能障碍(败血症综合征)或真菌感染。在此类高危患者中,G-CSF与抗生素一起使用可能是合理的。经验性的抗真菌治疗是有效的,特别是对于中性粒细胞减少症的患者,使用经验性抗生素治疗治疗了7天,但仍保持发热,或出现发热,然后又发烧。在决定给患者输血时,都应考虑患者的整体临床状况和实验室参数。依泊汀将来可能作为血红蛋白水平低于10 g / dl的化疗相关性贫血患者的治疗选择。将预防性血小板的阈值设置为10,000 /微升,而将阈值设置为20,000 /微升,则可以降低血小板的总利用率,而对出血的不良影响很小,而对发病率没有统计学上的显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号