...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical primatology >AIDS as a zoonosis? Confusion over the origin of the virus and the origin of the epidemics
【24h】

AIDS as a zoonosis? Confusion over the origin of the virus and the origin of the epidemics

机译:艾滋病是人畜共患病吗?对病毒的起源和流行病的起源感到困惑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on findings demonstrating the simian ancestry of HIV, AIDS has been reported to be a zoonosis. However, this theory has never been proved and must seriously be questioned. Several arguments show that HIV-AIDS is not a zoonosis. (i) If AIDS were a zoonosis, there must be evidence of AIDS being directly acquired from an animal species, as is rabies, a disease that is directly acquired from animals. (ii) Despite long-term and frequent human exposure to SIV-infected monkeys in Africa, only 11 cross-species transmission events are known, and only four of these have resulted in significant human-to-human transmission, generating HIV-1 groups M and O and HIV-2 groups A and B. The closest relatives of SIVcpz (HIV-1 group N) and of SIVsm (HIV-2 groups C-H) are extremely rare, with only six HIV-1 group N-infected patients and only single individuals known to be infected by HIV-2 groups C-H. SIV, while capable of cross-species transmission, is thus poorly adapted for disease and epidemic spread. If AIDS were a zoonosis that is capable of significant human-to-human spread, there would be a plethora of founder subtypes and groups. (iii) Human exposure to SIV is thousands of years old, but AIDS emerged only in the 20th century. If AIDS were a zoonosis that spread into the human population, it would have spread to the West during slave trade. (iv) Experimental transmission of SIVs to different species of monkeys is often well controlled by the new host, showing that the virus and not the disease is transmitted. Therefore, we conclude that cross-species transmission of SIV does not in itself constitute the basis for a zoonosis. Transmission per se is not the major requirement for the generation of the AIDS epidemic. All HIVs do derive from simian species, but AIDS does not qualify as a zoonosis and this explanation cannot in itself account for the origin of AIDS epidemic. It is important to distinguish AIDS from true zoonoses (e.g. rabies) because research is needed to understand the processes by which animal viruses cause sustained human-to-human transmission, epidemics and even pandemics. Much is known about emerging viruses, but almost nothing is known about emerging viral diseases.
机译:根据证明艾滋病毒的猿猴血统的发现,据报道艾滋病为人畜共患病。但是,这一理论尚未得到证实,必须受到严重质疑。一些论点表明,艾滋病毒/艾滋病不是人畜共患病。 (i)如果艾滋病是人畜共患病,则必须有证据表明艾滋病是直接从动物物种获得的,狂犬病是直接从动物身上获得的疾病。 (ii)尽管非洲人长期和频繁接触SIV感染的猴子,但已知只有11种跨物种传播事件,其中只有4种导致重大的人际传播,产生了HIV-1组M,O和HIV-2组A和B。SIVcpz(HIV-1组N)和SIVsm(HIV-2组CH)的近亲极为罕见,只有6名HIV-1组N感染患者和只有已知感染HIV-2的单身人群CH。 SIV虽然能够跨物种传播,但其对疾病和流行病的适应性很差。如果艾滋病是一种可以在人与人之间传播的人畜共患病,那么就会有太多的创始人亚型和群体。 (iii)人类接触SIV已有数千年的历史,但艾滋病仅在20世纪出现。如果艾滋病是一种传播到人类的人畜共患病,那么它在奴隶贸易期间将传播到西方。 (iv)新宿主通常很好地控制了SIV向不同物种的猴子的实验性传播,这表明病毒而非疾病得以传播。因此,我们得出结论,SIV的跨物种传播本身并不构成人畜共患病的基础。传播本身并不是产生艾滋病流行的主要要求。所有的艾滋病毒的确来自猿猴物种,但艾滋病不属于人畜共患病,这种解释本身不能解释艾滋病流行的原因。将艾滋病与真正的人畜共患病(例如狂犬病)区分开来很重要,因为需要进行研究以了解动物病毒引起持续的人对人传播,流行病甚至大流行的过程。关于新兴病毒知之甚少,但对于新兴病毒性疾病几乎一无所知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号