首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns contributing to missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers: A process analysis of closed malpractice claims
【24h】

Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns contributing to missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers: A process analysis of closed malpractice claims

机译:导致乳腺癌和大肠癌漏诊和误诊的认知错误和后勤故障:一项针对不正当医疗事故索赔的过程分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To erform a process analysis of missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers to identify: (1) the cognitive and logistical factors that lead to these diagnostic errors, and (2) prevention strategies. METHODS: Using 56 cases (43 breast, 13 colon) of missed and delayed diagnosis, we performed structured analyses to identify specific points in the diagnostic process in which errors occurred. Each error was classified as either a cognitive error or logistical breakdown. Finally, two physician-investigators identified strategies to prevent the errors in each case. RESULTS: Virtually all cases involved one or more cognitive errors (53/56, 95 %) and approximately half (31/56, 55 %) involved logistical breakdowns. The clinical activity most prone to cognitive error was the selection of the diagnostic strategy, both during the office visit (25/56, 45 %) and during interpretation of test results (22/50, 44 %). Arrangement of follow-up visits with a primary care physician (8/29, 28 %) or specialist physician (7/29, 26 %) were especially prone to logistical breakdowns. Adherence to current clinical guidelines could have prevented at least one error in 66 % of cases and assistance from a patient advocate could have prevented at least one error in 48 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive errors and logistical breakdowns are common among missed and delayed diagnoses of breast and colorectal cancers. Prevention strategies should focus on ensuring improving the effectiveness and use of clinical guidelines in the selection of diagnostic strategy, both during office visits and when interpreting test results. Tools to facilitate communication and to ensure that followup visits occur should also be considered.
机译:目的:对乳腺癌和大肠癌的漏诊和延误诊断进行过程分析,以识别:(1)导致这些诊断错误的认知和后勤因素,以及(2)预防策略。方法:使用56例漏诊和延误诊断的病例(43例乳腺,13例结肠),我们进行了结构化分析,以识别诊断过程中发生错误的特定点。每个错误都被分类为认知错误或后勤故障。最后,两名医师调查人员确定了在每种情况下均可以防止错误的策略。结果:几乎所有病例都涉及一个或多个认知错误(53 / 56,95%),大约一半(31 / 56,55%)涉及逻辑故障。在办公室就诊期间(25 / 56,45%)和解释测试结果期间(22 / 50,44%),最容易出现认知错误的临床活动是诊断策略的选择。与初级保健医生(8/29,28%)或专科医生(7/29,26%)进行随访的安排特别容易出现后勤问题。遵守当前的临床指南可以在66%的病例中避免至少一个错误,而患者拥护者的帮助可以在48%的病例中防止至少一个错误。结论:在乳腺癌和大肠癌的漏诊和延误诊断中,认知错误和后勤故障很常见。预防策略应侧重于确保在就诊期间和解释测试结果时选择诊断策略时提高临床指南的有效性和实用性。还应考虑使用促进交流和确保进行后续访问的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号